Transphobe debunking thread

Gigafly

Well-known schlogga
GOLDEN GOD
🏅
Joined
Apr 21, 2024
Messages
4,496
Transgender People are Valid

Forward - an incomplete list of the reputable scientific & social organizations which affirm the validity of transgender people (that transness is not an illness, that trans people are deseving of respect and equal rights, etc). This also serves as a list of the institutions which recognize the difference between sex and gender.

American Psychological Association
American Medical Association
American Psychoanalytic Association
Human Rights Campaign
American Academy of Pediatrics
American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians
United Nations
United Kingdom’s National Health Service

American Psychological Association
pamphlet on transgender issues
Affirms psychological consensus - that transgender people are valid, have existed throughout history, are subject to discrimination, and that transness is not a mental disorder.
A 2008 Gender Identity Resolution by the American Psychological Association which expands upon the premises listed in the annotation above and supports total equality for transgender people - affirmation of the institutional legitimacy of transness in psychology.
Identical to the above, essentially, except pertaining to trans and gender-nonconforming youth.
Booklet on LGBTQ issues from the American Psychological Association, outlining their policy and attitudes towards aforementioned communities.
Expressly positive.
Human Rights Campaign document published with the American Academy of Pediatrics & the American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians which affirms the validity of transgender youth, encourages appropriate care and respect for their transness and provides resouces on how to do so.
The UK’s National Health Service report on gender dysphoria, which affirms the validity of trans people and discusses ways in which gender dysphoria can be alleviated, the best of which is said to often be social and physical transition.
The American Psychoanalytic Association’s statement on gender identity, in which transness is validated, social stigma against transgender people is cited as a serious cause of harm and ‘reparative therapy’ - attempts to suppress one’s transness and force them to live as the gender they were assigned at birth - is medically invalid.
The World Health Organization recently stopped classifying transness as a mental disorder.
Multilateral condemnation of ‘conversion therapy’ from essentially every medical institution in the United Kingdom, with reasons provided.
Transphobia? The United Nations says no.

Gender Transition has a Positive Effect on Trans People

ENORMOUS meta-meta-analysis on transgender people and the effect gender transition has on their mental health
Of 56 studies, 52 indicated transitioning has a positive effect on the mental health of transgender people and 4 indicated it had mixed or no results.
ZERO studies indicated gender transitioning has negative results
This pretty much ends the argument right here.
Longitudinal study on the effectiveness of puberty suppression & sex reassignment surgery on trans individuals in improving mental outcomes
Unambiguously positive results - results indicate puberty suppression, support of medical professionals & SRS have markedly beneficial outcomes to trans individuals’ mental health and productivity.
Meta-analysis of studies concerning individuals who underwent sex reassignment surgery
80% of individuals reported significant improvement in dysphoria
78% of individuals reported significant improvement in psychological symptoms
72% of individuals reported significant improvement in sexual function
Children who socially transition report levels of depression and anxiety which closely match levels reported by cisgender children, indicating social transition massively decreases the risk factor of both.
“A new study has confirmed that transgender youth often have mental health problems and that their depression and anxiety improve greatly with recognition and treatment of gender dysphoria”
Longitudinal study which indicates transgender people have a lower quality of life than the general population.
However, that quality of life raises dramatically with ‘Gender Affirming Treatment’, the nature of which is detailed extensively in-text.
Extensive and incredibly interesting document on the standards of care for transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals.
A good read, but won’t win you any arguments.

Trans People in Sports

Meta-analysis covering prior research on trans individuals’ performance in sports and preexisting sports policies concerning trans people
Findings show there is no consistent or direct research indicating transgender women have an unfair athletic advantage at any stage of their transition.
Additional findings show most sports policies are not evidence-based and trans individuals experience substantial discrimination from sports institutions.

Sex is Complicated and not a Binary

Scientific American graphic describing the many characteristics which factor into one's sexual identity.
Helpful in indicating the ambiguous and bimodal nature of sex/responding to people who believes it’s as simple as XX/XY
NY Times Op-Ed from a professor of biology & gender studies
Explains the biological complexity of sex and the ways in which the Trump Administration’s attempts to legislate that complexity of of existence is both immoral and unscientific.
Description of modern scientific attitudes towards human sex.
“The view that the world’s population can be separated into a clearly defined dyadic unit of male and female is defunct; not only clinical observations, but molecular biology has established that sexual identity is on a continuum, with an enormous potential for variance”
 
Queer People are Still Oppressed (and that’s why their suicide rate is higher)

2018 LGBTQ Youth Report
HUGE collection of data concerning difficulties LGBTQ people face
67% of LGBTQ youth hear their parents make negative statements about LGBTQ people - rises to 78% if child is in closet.
48% of LGBTQ youth say their family makes them feel bad for their identity
This pretty much ends the argument right here.
Broad international study of trans suicide rate (it’s quite high).
“Gender-based victimization, discrimination, bullying, violence, being rejected by the family, friends, and community; harassment by intimate partner, family members, police and public; discrimination and ill treatment at health-care system are the major risk factors that influence the suicidal behavior among transgender persons”.
Massive demographic analysis which codifies the many social & institutional factors which contribute to trans suicide rates
Surprise surprise, discrimination & abuse play a huge role. Read the summary.
Analysis of the ways in which parental support affect elements of disadvantage experienced by transgender youth.
Most notably, strong parental support decreases the likelihood of a suicide attempt within the past year from 57% to just 4%.
Analysis of crime & privacy violations as they relate to concerns raised by those who advocate for ‘trans bathroom bills’
Analysis indicates there is no empirical evidence to support these concerns; such crimes & privacy violations are exceptionally rare. Calls for trans bathroom bills are fearmongering, plain and simple.
Interesting (and long) qualitative analysis on the depiction of transgender people in Sports Illustrated over past decades.
Finds disproportionately negative depictions (of course).
Worth reading; probably not going to win you an argument.
16 countries in Europe & Central Asia still require sterilization before transgender peoples’ gender identity can be legally recognized
News article - June 2019
Trump Administration rejecting requests from US embassies to fly the rainbow pride flag on embassies’ main banner during Pride Month
LGBTQ youth are 120% (2.2x) as likely to experience homelessness as cisgender and heterosexual youth.
Up to 40% of the homeless youth population is LGBTQ
Cited possibility for this discrepancy being LGBTQ youth getting kicked out of the home by unwelcoming/openly hostile family.
LGBTQ employment discrimination is still far from a settled issue.
A point of note - in 2017, the Trump Administration used the Department of Justice to revoke an Obama-era Title VII policy which protected transgender employees from discrimination.
 

You missed some statistics, sir.
 
Trans People Have Always Existed
Regret And Detransition Are Incredibly Rare
In a free society, people will sometimes make decisions - medical or otherwise - that they later come to regret. This is an unavoidable fact of life, and the regret of former patients is not in itself a mark against any medical procedure. If it was, we wouldn’t be able to practice any medicine at all. Still, with that in mind, surveys have consistently found gender-affirming medical care to have ridiculously low regret rates.


Regret after Gender-affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence

Meta-analysis of 27 studies on patient regret rates following gender-affirming surgery.
With a total number of 7,928 patients surveyed, only 77 (~1%) reported regret.

Guiding the conversation—types of regret after gender-affirming surgery and their associated etiologies

Anonymous surveys were sent to 154 surgeons registered to the 2016 World Professional Association for Transgender Health conference, 30% of which responded.
Cumulatively, these respondents treated between 18,125 and 27,325 individuals.
The reported number of patients who expressed regret was 62, or ~0.2-0.3%.

Regret after Gender Affirming Surgery – A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Patient Experience

A multidisciplinary workgroup recorded incidents of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) and regret among their patients from 2016 to 2021.
Of 1,989 individuals who underwent GAS, only 6 (~0.3%) requested reversal surgery or detransitioned back to their birth sex.

Compare these gender-affirming care regret rates to other, commonplace medical procedures. One study found regret after primary knee and hip replacement surgery was either 17.1% or 4.8%, dependi*ng on the procedure method. An enormous meta-analysis on 889 studies concerning regret in surgical decision making found that on average, in procedures ranging from trivial to life-saving, the average rate of self-reported decision regret was one in seven. One in seven! About 14%! Gender-affirming care doesn’t even come close to that rate!


What’s more, many people who detransition do so for reasons other than regret. The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Report found that of those who had at one point detransitioned, 62% then later re-transitioned in some capacity. This was because the reasons for detransition were often social (lack of parental support, social shaming) or financial (too expensive, change in medical plan) rather than regret. A 2021 study of 237 detransitioners found the same, that the most common reasons for detransition were not regret. A 2022 study found that of 2,242 detransitioners, only 15.9% reported an internal driving factor in that decision, such as doubts about their gender identity.




Gender-Affirming Care Helps
Subheader


Titled Link
Data point summary, bolded for emphasis.

Detransition Is Rare And Often Involuntary

Hysteria Over Trans People In Sports
“Social Contagion”
Rebutting this point is more of a rhetorical exercise than a data-driven one. The “social contagion” anti-trans argument is essentially that transness is socially influenced; that being exposed to trans people and pro-trans ideas makes people more likely to be trans. This effect is likened to a disease, usually alongside the implication that there will be some dire social consequence to not controlling the disease’s spread.


Let’s first acknowledge that “exposure to this idea makes you more likely to accept or identify with it” puts transness in the same category as one’s political opinions, social views, religious orientation, food preferences, ethical biases, preferred sports team, national allegiances, perspectives on war and pacifism, and preference towards slotting your toilet paper roll in the correct way or the incorrect way. Put simply, almost everything about a person’s identity is at least somewhat influenced by exposure to ideas surrounding that identity. This is often brought up in the context of left-handedness, where its frequency in the population appeared to sharply rise then level off as religious bigotry against left-handedness dissipated, or in homosexuality, where countries with extremely punitive anti-gay laws and media censorship seem to mysteriously have no gay people (in census data, at least).

Leaving even all that aside, the conservative “trans social contagion” argument is inherently self-defeating. Consider: they argue against an increased proportion of trans representation in media and education because the exposure appears to create more transgender people, and want a greater (read:total) proportion of cisgender representation so fewer people will be transgender. Are they not, then, treating cisgenderism as its own social contagion? Their push for less trans representation is an endorsement of the very same “exposure creates identity” logic they claim is exclusive to transness, a logic which is in fact almost universally applicable to all elements of our identity. The onus is on them to justify their arbitrary preference for one “contagion” over another, and they cannot.

“Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” is essentially just a pseudo-medicalized expression of the same “social contagion” panic. It was coined in this extremely bad study, and even a brief glance at its methodology reveals how meaningless its conclusions really are. Essentially, the researchers surveyed the parents of trans youth and created a term to describe the parents’ opinion on how their children came to be trans. Where were these parents found? Anti-trans websites. This was analogous to creating a term to legitimize the opinions you’ve gathered on racial IQ differences after polling people from white nationalist websites. Absolutely ridiculous.
 
(((American Psychological Association)))
(((American Medical Association)))
((*American Psychoanalytic Association)))
((*Human Rights Campaign)))
(((American Academy of Pediatrics)))
(((American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians)))
(((United Nations)))
(((United Kingdom’s National Health Service)))
 
Everyone except the schizo is jewish and paid by Soros & the WEF btw
>being Jewish and paid by Soros & the WEF
gigacord sample 56.png
 
Trans People Have Always Existed
Regret And Detransition Are Incredibly Rare
In a free society, people will sometimes make decisions - medical or otherwise - that they later come to regret. This is an unavoidable fact of life, and the regret of former patients is not in itself a mark against any medical procedure. If it was, we wouldn’t be able to practice any medicine at all. Still, with that in mind, surveys have consistently found gender-affirming medical care to have ridiculously low regret rates.


Regret after Gender-affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence

Meta-analysis of 27 studies on patient regret rates following gender-affirming surgery.
With a total number of 7,928 patients surveyed, only 77 (~1%) reported regret.

Guiding the conversation—types of regret after gender-affirming surgery and their associated etiologies

Anonymous surveys were sent to 154 surgeons registered to the 2016 World Professional Association for Transgender Health conference, 30% of which responded.
Cumulatively, these respondents treated between 18,125 and 27,325 individuals.
The reported number of patients who expressed regret was 62, or ~0.2-0.3%.

Regret after Gender Affirming Surgery – A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Patient Experience

A multidisciplinary workgroup recorded incidents of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) and regret among their patients from 2016 to 2021.
Of 1,989 individuals who underwent GAS, only 6 (~0.3%) requested reversal surgery or detransitioned back to their birth sex.

Compare these gender-affirming care regret rates to other, commonplace medical procedures. One study found regret after primary knee and hip replacement surgery was either 17.1% or 4.8%, dependi*ng on the procedure method. An enormous meta-analysis on 889 studies concerning regret in surgical decision making found that on average, in procedures ranging from trivial to life-saving, the average rate of self-reported decision regret was one in seven. One in seven! About 14%! Gender-affirming care doesn’t even come close to that rate!


What’s more, many people who detransition do so for reasons other than regret. The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey Report found that of those who had at one point detransitioned, 62% then later re-transitioned in some capacity. This was because the reasons for detransition were often social (lack of parental support, social shaming) or financial (too expensive, change in medical plan) rather than regret. A 2021 study of 237 detransitioners found the same, that the most common reasons for detransition were not regret. A 2022 study found that of 2,242 detransitioners, only 15.9% reported an internal driving factor in that decision, such as doubts about their gender identity.




Gender-Affirming Care Helps
Subheader


Titled Link
Data point summary, bolded for emphasis.

Detransition Is Rare And Often Involuntary

Hysteria Over Trans People In Sports
“Social Contagion”
Rebutting this point is more of a rhetorical exercise than a data-driven one. The “social contagion” anti-trans argument is essentially that transness is socially influenced; that being exposed to trans people and pro-trans ideas makes people more likely to be trans. This effect is likened to a disease, usually alongside the implication that there will be some dire social consequence to not controlling the disease’s spread.


Let’s first acknowledge that “exposure to this idea makes you more likely to accept or identify with it” puts transness in the same category as one’s political opinions, social views, religious orientation, food preferences, ethical biases, preferred sports team, national allegiances, perspectives on war and pacifism, and preference towards slotting your toilet paper roll in the correct way or the incorrect way. Put simply, almost everything about a person’s identity is at least somewhat influenced by exposure to ideas surrounding that identity. This is often brought up in the context of left-handedness, where its frequency in the population appeared to sharply rise then level off as religious bigotry against left-handedness dissipated, or in homosexuality, where countries with extremely punitive anti-gay laws and media censorship seem to mysteriously have no gay people (in census data, at least).

Leaving even all that aside, the conservative “trans social contagion” argument is inherently self-defeating. Consider: they argue against an increased proportion of trans representation in media and education because the exposure appears to create more transgender people, and want a greater (read:total) proportion of cisgender representation so fewer people will be transgender. Are they not, then, treating cisgenderism as its own social contagion? Their push for less trans representation is an endorsement of the very same “exposure creates identity” logic they claim is exclusive to transness, a logic which is in fact almost universally applicable to all elements of our identity. The onus is on them to justify their arbitrary preference for one “contagion” over another, and they cannot.

“Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” is essentially just a pseudo-medicalized expression of the same “social contagion” panic. It was coined in this extremely bad study, and even a brief glance at its methodology reveals how meaningless its conclusions really are. Essentially, the researchers surveyed the parents of trans youth and created a term to describe the parents’ opinion on how their children came to be trans. Where were these parents found? Anti-trans websites. This was analogous to creating a term to legitimize the opinions you’ve gathered on racial IQ differences after polling people from white nationalist websites. Absolutely ridiculous.
 
Back
Top