Stop hate

[Meliton Manzanas]

@General Niggnin is leaking his tiny clitty already kek he couldn’t take a joke nor my answers!

 

[General Niggnin]

yeah your just a edgy clittycel

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

yeah your just a edgy clittycel

>your
*You’re or You are
Sorry I had to correct your low-iq eslbabble before getting on with my reply, I just answered your question with a joke that was true and based in reality and also who is the clittycel here? You’re the one who tranny reacted me just because he couldn’t debunk nor reply to actual arguements

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

yeah your just a edgy clittycel

Another esl typo, Sad. Poor grammar! Looks like this dude didn’t pay attention in English class if he ven took it.
>Your just a edgy clittycel
Correction:
You’re just an edgy clittycel

 

[FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte]

>if he ven took it.

Holy failerald.

 

[General Niggnin]

Holy failerald.

Clittycels can’t even spell geg

 

[Ytsuken]

>Stop hate

 

[Gem Control]

The west has rizzen billions must live

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

Clittycels can’t even spell geg

I like you btw

 

[Ytsuken]

Poopson tier thread

 

[General Niggnin]

I like you btw

I’m Jewish btw

 

[Fagon]

Shut up, faggot.

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

I’m Jewish btw

Well uhhh on that

 

[MoonMetropolis]

If it doesn’t violate human rights

Of all the bullshit concepts advocated by libertarians, the most bullshit one (which is REALLY saying something) would probably have to be the concept of "states' rights". Libertarians are perfectly fine with authoritarian government tyranny, just as long as it's the states doing it. The concept of "states' rights" has never been used to justify anything even remotely good. During the Civil War, "states' rights" meant the "right" of states to practice slavery. A century later, "states' rights" meant the "right" of states to enforce racial segregation (and many libertarians, including the Cato Institute, still believe that states should have the "right" to enforce racial segregation). We already tried giving the states total autonomy before. It was called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, and it was an unmitigated disaster.

 

[General Niggnin]

the concept of "states' rights" has never been used to justify anything even remotely good. During the Civil War, "states' rights" meant the "right" of states to practice slavery. A century later, "states' rights" meant the "right" of states to enforce racial segregation (and many libertarians, including the Cato Institute, still believe that states should have the "right" to enforce racial segregation).

This is true in the states and lots of other countries but sometimes it can be used for good fighting against the federal government. (Mostly related to corrupt regulations or taxes the feds give, obviously all states are incredibly corrupt but it is good you can move states if you don’t like the taxes there)