My classmates in this shitty sociology-tier class are presenting shit about movies they watched

Emphasize how keyed he is for talking about this in your note since you live in tranada
Doesn't really matter, the professor doesn't even read this shit he just checks that you did it and gives you a random grade. Usually high doe
 
Presenter: Sahil
Topic: Why Ratatouille should be considered a great film
Film: Ratatouille
-Takes a long time explaining the plot of this film
-Explains the themes of the film
-The theme which he claims is why the film is so enjoyable is "Anyone Can Cook"
-Explains how the main character Remy, despite being a rat, has talents
-Uses this to connect to a quality of inspiring the audience
-Explains how the female chef character "breaks the patriarchy" due to her aggressive nature
-Spends a great deal of time hyperfocusing on this detail
(This guy is an afghan faggot and I had to listen to the whole presentation in his faggot accent)
He should become a youtube video essayist
 
>Complains how the majority of the cast are "white men", Goes onto criticise the lack of representation
1737136670947d.jpg
 
Presenter: Sophia
Topic: Comparison of the films Inside out and Inside out 2
Film: Inside out
-Speaks very quickly, covering the whole story in a large amount of time
-Appreciates how the film covers serious topics such as mental health, despite being a children's movie
-Appreciates small details in the film which are relatable to the audience
-Blunder: The presentation goes overtime but she is still talking exclusively about the storyline
-States how the film and it's sequel are too similar and are essentially just wordswapped
(This girl is so SISA but talks so fast)
 
Presenter: Nino
Topic: Why Cabin in the Woods should be considered a great film
Film: Cabin in the Woods

-Speaks very briefly about the story itself, it is a parody on the horror genre.
-Teenagers go to camp in a cabin but the cabin is a high tech bunker
-Speaks about how the characters follow very simple and cliche archetypes such as the jock, virgin, whore, final girl etc.
-Explains the order in which the characters die or escape/survive
-Highlights how every aspect of the film follows an existing cliche of horror movies.
-Gives critic reviews about the film, supporting his "great film" proposition
(this is the kind of guy who you think is retarded but gets good grades)
 
That was the last one for today. I was scheduled to go next but I was saved by the bell. Will have to do it on monday
 
Presenter: Alexander
Topic: Comparison of The thing 1951 vs 1982 remake
Film: The Thing
-Communicates the plot of both films, there are only a few similarities
-Notes the origin of each film
-Explains in great depth, specific parts of the films which carry similarities
-States the themes of the films, Distrust and Claustrophobia, especially distrust
-Complains how the majority of the cast are "white men", Goes onto criticise the lack of representation

(This is so SNCA I don't care to continue listening, brain hurty, he stuttered and twitched a lot due to being an autist)
wow literally nigga talked water for the entire presentation, it's just a fucking re-make STFU
-Explains how the female chef character "breaks the patriarchy" due to her aggressive nature
bruh
 
Presenter: Sahil
Topic: Why Ratatouille should be considered a great film
Film: Ratatouille
-Takes a long time explaining the plot of this film
-Explains the themes of the film
-The theme which he claims is why the film is so enjoyable is "Anyone Can Cook"
-Explains how the main character Remy, despite being a rat, has talents
-Uses this to connect to a quality of inspiring the audience
-Explains how the female chef character "breaks the patriarchy" due to her aggressive nature
-Spends a great deal of time hyperfocusing on this detail
(This guy is an afghan faggot and I had to listen to the whole presentation in his faggot accent)
w mans
 
Presenter: Victoria
Topic: Colours in Film
Film: La La Land
-Explains the plot of the film, a couple in Hollywood becoming artists
-Explains the origin and awards of the film, director etc.
-In-depth character explanation, Mia and Sebastian are main characters.
-Explains how each character is associated with a colour, Mia is red, Sebastian is Blue, this is prominent in romantic moments
-Gives more examples of scenes where this is represented
-States that Green is the colour theme of discourse between the main characters

(Obese chick wastes 5 minutes of my life bullshitting, making several mistakes throughout)
>Victoria

Pepe kekking.png
 
Back
Top