thread_prefix.27 Ban megathread

Status
Not open for further replies.
That means nothing because you don't know if Dr. Cobson groomed X Immigrant into wanting him to groom him. It makes no sense. I would understand it if X Immigrant threatened him and such into being gay, but Dr. Cobson apparently approached X Immigrant first for the cybersex.
1736956949143.png
 
Saying he groomed him because he was older is fucking retarded because they were basically the same age. You can point to other evidence of “grooming” but that age difference is a retarded reason to prove it’s grooming.
You are overcomplicating this by involving the concept of age into this conversation, we hold the same belief, no need to argue over this.
 
I know, but it doesn't change the fact that X Immigrant had some malice. He even made a throwaway account for this shit while Dr. Cobson used his actual account. The fact it devolved into this in 7 days means he was basically steering him into doing this shit. This is how groomers operate and even if he isn't significantly older, he used groomer tactics
The fact that it devolved into this in 7 days makes me think the opposite actually, that Dr. Cobson was complicit in this.
 
Again, you can't trust a single word a gooner says. He has post-nut regret and he'll do anything to save face.
I know, but it doesn't change the fact that X Immigrant had some malice. He even made a throwaway account for this shit while Dr. Cobson used his actual account. The fact it devolved into this in 7 days means he was basically steering him into doing this shit. This is how groomers operate and even if he isn't significantly older, he used groomer tactics
Source?
 
>Child-on-child sexual abuse is a form of child sexual abuse in which a prepubescent child is sexually abused
I'd love it if you could direct me to the prepubescent child in this situation.
>In the case of child-on-child sexual abuse, young children who have not matured sexually are incapable of knowing about specific sex acts without an external source.
Again, I'd love it if any of the 2 retards who genius-reacted me could direct me to the prepubescent child who hasn't sexually matured.
 
This guy and I are right and everyone else is wrong. I can confidently say this.
no, youre just confidently wrong
the screenshots are literally right in front of you, x immigrant was feminizing and grooming drcobson it is RIGHT THERE in front of you oh my god stop fucking defending this freak
 
no, youre just confidently wrong
the screenshots are literally right in front of you, x immigrant was feminizing and grooming drcobson it is RIGHT THERE in front of you oh my god stop fucking defending this freak
So what? That means nothing in their relationship dynamic. It could be all roleplay, for all you know. What do you consider grooming?
 
no, youre just confidently wrong
the screenshots are literally right in front of you, x immigrant was feminizing and grooming drcobson it is RIGHT THERE in front of you oh my god stop fucking defending this freak
The screenshots are there and I chose to interpret them differently as compared to you.
 
>In the case of child-on-child sexual abuse, young children who have not matured sexually are incapable of knowing about specific sex acts without an external source.
Again, I'd love it if any of the 2 retards who genius-reacted me could direct me to the prepubescent child who hasn't sexually matured.
X immigrant groomed Dr. cobson
He tried to turn him into a femboy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top