VOTE! Should nuance be shown to rule breaking content?

Should janny give pedophilic "jokes" the benefit of the doubt?


  • Total voters
    57
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Age should not be a factor in whether sexualizing children is okay on the site or not. The sharty is an adult site that allows 16 and 17 yos, nothing less. While you aren't technically being a ped if you are underage, talking dirty about underage girls on an imageboard splinter is and should be taboo. You can talk about your girlfriend or your crush or whatever but you shouldn't get too sexual about it, even then its awkward in the culture we are part of to do so.
>B-but soy-TEENS tenage website! Not true. Remember, if you join this website at sixteen, you are only a soy TEEN for 2 years. I was 17 when I joined the sharty. I am 21 now.
>I am 21 now
unc.....
 
froot literally implied intimacy w/ my <18 sister once. No nuance for pedo's means a banned froot (thoughbeit froot is a slf who makes pedo jokes while banning pedos, giving him a monopoly of all the 'p on the sharty).
 
no froot = no sharty
no sharty = no soipoopoosphere
no froot = 'p free sharty tho (ignore that this will be achieved by nvking the shardy just like how soymmunism will free the people from problems like starvation cos they can't starve if they're dead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top