Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Pharisees weren't wrong in following the tradition of God necessarily, they were wrong for going against Jesus because of it. Those specific traditions were made by man or simply misinterpreted. However, if tradition follows the will of Jesus, it is good. By following what the original Christians did, who directly followed Jesus, their tradition is good. Good vs bad tradition is talked of many times in the Bible.lawl.. just... lawl. I said show me a picture of a Pharisee by the description the Bible gives..... if it's not the Vatican or Orthodox priest class it should be much different.. Gold statues and idols, paintings and icons, all dedicated, fine linens and robes, with fancy outfits and colors on edges... by Biblical defintion. I want to see a Pharisee according to the Bible's description.
Which ones? The one on the horse and in the chair? I should let you know that those replicate temple priests from the old testament, which do influence the garments of Catholics and the Orthodox. However, if this is bad in of itself, as I already told you, St. Paul, an original Christian, is bad as well.I'll take one pic from there tho... and by your own words this is a Pharisee.
View attachment 6933
^^
Sure appears your Orthodox priests are the same Pharisees but on crack...
![]()
![]()
Fucking CSAM? Holy shit you're such a projecting faggot. Also Jesus was Galilean, the precursors of the Celts in Ireland.Why do we still argue? Christianity is fucking shit. Don't giev money to weirdos who are into CSAM. it was created in middle east by syrian shitskins.
make shit stuff I wonFucking CSAM? Holy shit you're such a projecting faggot. Also Jesus was Galilean, the precursors of the Celts in Ireland.
Gigachad does this on the occasion.>we must shitfling for 24 pages straight about interpretations o algo
Pharisees weren't wrong in following the tradition of God necessarily, they were wrong for going against Jesus because of it. Those specific traditions were made by man or simply misinterpreted. However, if tradition follows the will of Jesus, it is good. By following what the original Christians did, who directly followed Jesus, their tradition is good. Good vs bad tradition is talked of many times in the Bible.
The real problem with the pharisees was their moral character. They didn't practice what they told everyone to do, and conspired to and indirectly killed Jesus and harmed many others. That's the most infamous aspect of a pharisee.
Which ones? The one on the horse and in the chair? I should let you know that those replicate temple priests from the old testament, which do influence the garments of Catholics and the Orthodox. However, if this is bad in of itself, as I already told you, St. Paul, an original Christian, is bad as well.
Here's a simple question for you nagolbud, how do you know the Bible you have in hand is reliable when its canonical list of books were decided by the same people you claim to be "pagans"? It's not like the biblical canon magically fell out of the sky. If you are relying on the canon decided by filthy pagans then doesn't that also make you one? Seems self contradictory. From the sola scriptura point of view, Orthodox tradition is entirely heretical, so why not reject our biblical canon too? You are relying on something these "pagans" compiled despite claiming you are only following God.Imagine denying Jesus Christ's own words so you can be a soygion for some retard man made religion where priests and fathers run around throwing crackers in the air...
View attachment 7254
Here's a simple question for you nagolbud, how do you know the Bible you have in hand is reliable when its canonical list of books were decided by the same people you claim to be "pagans"? It's not like the biblical canon magically fell out of the sky. If you are relying on the canon decided by filthy pagans then doesn't that also make you one? Seems self contradictory. From the sola scriptura point of view, Orthodox tradition is entirely heretical, so why not reject our biblical canon too? You are relying on something these "pagans" compiled despite claiming you are only following God.
I am of course aware that prots reject the deuterocanonical books, but that doesn't mean they aren't using the biblical canon of the Catholics as a base to build on. All they did was taking a few books out.
From the sola scriptura point of view, Orthodox tradition is entirely heretical.
Because there wasn't a specific denomination. There were only Christians, that followed the traditions of the Orthodox church. Once different teachings of the Bible came into play there was a need for denominations.View attachment 7290
Pagans or "Original christians" didnt do shit for the Bible. You confuse the Bible believers who had no denomination.
New headcanon just dropped.The people that translated the english bible from greek NT and hewbrew OT were running from the orthodox church and the catholic church,
Literally proved that those outfits you're insulting are those that pre-covenant priests and an apostle(Peter) wore.you retards really can't get over your stupid cracker throwing priests in pharisee outfits, they had nothing to do with the Bible, EVER.
Because preaching in a public building was illegal, so they had to be secretive. A house church was discovered to have icons as I have already told you.The apostles did shit themselves, and preached with no church building.
Yeah, we did.Your gay ass religions had nothing to do with ANY of that.
Maybe listen to the one that has preserved God's tradition since Jesus's time, and even before that.How the fuck can 20 different religious sects claim they are the Bible creators and doctrine makers... what a stupid ass fucking larp.
Because there wasn't a specific denomination. There were only Christians, that followed the traditions of the Orthodox church. Once different teachings of the Bible came into play there was a need for denominations.
New headcanon just dropped.
Literally proved that those outfits you're insulting are those that pre-covenant priests and an apostle(Peter) wore.
Because preaching in a public building was illegal, so they had to be secretive. A house church was discovered to have icons as I have already told you.
Yeah, we did.
Maybe listen to the one that has preserved God's tradition since Jesus's time, and even before that.
Everything you've said about that has been refuted... over and over.Religious cult larpology... over and over.
>tells me to have original thoughtYou don't have an original thought, everything you know is been brainwashed into you. Think for yourself. Read the Bible yourself.
Because tradition from God is just as important.Why do you need a cracker throwing fag in a dress if you have the complete Bible and Jesus Christ?
New toss...The Orthodix church
Everything you've said about that has been refuted... over and over.
>tells me to have original thought
>READ THE BIBLE
I don't get it. I do think for myself, but sometimes we need to listen to people, especially God.
Because tradition from God is just as important.
Nigga...I've told you that Old-Covenant Christians and Peter the apostle wore these garments, and that house churches had icons in them. Are you even listening you dumb nigger?Where's the scripture that says follow pharisees in dresses? This is what religious nutters do, they add to the Bible and dismiss everything that refutes their stupid ass traditions.. 300 years the apostles existed, created the Bible, before your dumbass church was even around...
These churches I assume you're referring to were the result of the eucemenial councils. They don't have anything to do with Eastern Orthodoxy and don't hold communion with them. And as said, the only reason an Orthodox church exists is because of the schism between Cucktholics. That doesn't mean we don't hold on to the tradition of God.The Orthodox church didn't exist for 300 fucking years after the Bible was written