User mm/dd/yyyy is a pedophile

ummm chuddy i need some proof for those claims.
View attachment 33510

I only have 5 baby images; none are large enough to be 2 images in one. Perhaps you mean they are some form of stenography? Or is the embedded 'p a BitTorrent seed that leads/redirects (I don't know the P2P terminologies okay) to 'p? I won't say what you claim is impossible, but I will doubt their validity. Malding about nonexistent pedophilia and rape threats isn't going to scare a CHUD like me. Oh, in case you care about the partial image in the top right it is this.
Why is the filename "pedo"?
 
ummm chuddy i need some proof for those claims.
View attachment 33510

I only have 5 baby images; none are large enough to be 2 images in one. Perhaps you mean they are some form of stenography? Or is the embedded 'p a BitTorrent seed that leads/redirects (I don't know the P2P terminologies okay) to 'p? I won't say what you claim is impossible, but I will doubt their validity. Malding about nonexistent pedophilia and rape threats isn't going to scare a CHUD like me. Oh, in case you care about the partial image in the top right it is this.
>pedo.jpg
nice try pedo
 
ummm chuddy i need some proof for those claims.
View attachment 33510

I only have 5 baby images; none are large enough to be 2 images in one. Perhaps you mean they are some form of stenography? Or is the embedded 'p a BitTorrent seed that leads/redirects (I don't know the P2P terminologies okay) to 'p? I won't say what you claim is impossible, but I will doubt their validity. Malding about nonexistent pedophilia and rape threats isn't going to scare a CHUD like me. Oh, in case you care about the partial image in the top right it is this.
Also funny how you don't mention the dox Mr. Downey
 
I'll belive it.
1724784780769.png
 
Back
Top