Would you rather be poor and have a family that you can still maintain, or lonely but rich

calling black families “families” is the equivalent of calling a gaggle of geese a family
no they’re just a GAGGLE
you're indian, I don't care, and you'll never be superior to anyone ethnically.
 
you're indian, I don't care, and you'll never be superior to anyone ethnically.
>waaaaaa i have no other response than to call you a shitskin
BE ORIGINAL GOD DAMN IT YOURE MAKING IT HARD FOR ME TO PRETEND TO BE UPSET
 
No other response? You're trying to be racist while belonging to the most pathetic people on the planet.
bffr the video you sent was racist and you haven’t even seen the extent of london blacks.
i can’t believe you’re complaining about racism on THE SHLOG
 
I was a Chad at 23. Businesses. Salary jobs. Worthless. Easy. Poor with a family. Chud life for me. Hence living as a brokie in the hood of Mexico.
 
no they do not, go look at black people. Vid related.
Gegerald but ive heard that just having a child delivered or getting him a birth certificate or some other official stuff costs over 1000 dollars, probably several times that
 
>Rich because I could fund NGOs that bring migrants in and become my own BLACKED kino director
 

Attachments

  • bbcmoonman.png
    bbcmoonman.png
    31.1 KB · Views: 18
It depends, I'd choose family if it was in places that still have a sense of local community, but not dystopian shithole likes j*pan
 
Loneliness doesn't last forever, I'd just find someone while lonely and rich. If the question was "Would you rather be poor and have a family but never be rich, or be rich but never have a family?," I'd rather be poor and have a family.
 
Back
Top