Meta What the fuck is this?
- Thread starter SmallAnus
- Start date
- Status
SmallAnus
User has a large penis
Geg the ban was gonna end on 9/11 but the mod changed it right before I took a screenshot
Somehow, some of the staff didn't know that a conversation user-limit wasn't still enabled (I'm not sure when it was disabled, either), so, as far as I'm aware, the decision the administration has made is to try and close down all of the ones that don't fit that three-or-below user criteria. I'm not sure why we're issuing bans for it, albeit, when the rules have never said "don't create conversations with more than three people".
ILoveCoals
Nihahahaha!
Why aren't we allowed to make conversations with 3 or more people?
SmallAnus
User has a large penis
Because jannies (except baqqrih and Aedra because he's chill) don't get invited so their clitty leaks when they find out there's a secret club they're not invited to
I got told via a report that there were conversations with more than 3 people (bad bad no no from earlier schlog days) so I told one of the admins who verified these conversations existed to do the following
I guess he took it a different way than intended and banned people instead of deleting the conversations. There doesn't need to be a separate conversation with a quarter of the users in it that functions as a chat group. Do that shit in a thread. Intentionally evading janny to post in a secret club with just you and your best buddies is not the intended use of a forum and its a problem other forums have had to handle in the past with lots of unnecessary internal drama.
>but dool, it was allowed so we should be able to do it
Ever since the last "urgentcord" was nuked it should of been clear this was never intended usage of the conversations system, so the cry goes on deaf ears for me. When the code is in place via @Broot or otherwise then this will no longer be a problem or miscommunication worth addressing.
I guess he took it a different way than intended and banned people instead of deleting the conversations. There doesn't need to be a separate conversation with a quarter of the users in it that functions as a chat group. Do that shit in a thread. Intentionally evading janny to post in a secret club with just you and your best buddies is not the intended use of a forum and its a problem other forums have had to handle in the past with lots of unnecessary internal drama.
>but dool, it was allowed so we should be able to do it
Ever since the last "urgentcord" was nuked it should of been clear this was never intended usage of the conversations system, so the cry goes on deaf ears for me. When the code is in place via @Broot or otherwise then this will no longer be a problem or miscommunication worth addressing.
SmallAnus
User has a large penis
Could the users be unbanned and the conversations nuked instead? Most people don't remember or weren't there for the first urgentcord, so it would be unfair to ban them
SmallAnus
User has a large penis
Those more well versed in xenforo would have to be the ones to do so, or teach me to do it so it can be handled. For the record, it wasn't me who banned anyone but the red janny hasn't responded for a bit so if he's not back soon I'll unban people.
bnwoclitty
he/they
real schloggers are always standing up for the little guys...
glownigger
Spying on (You)
What happened to the urgentcord doe
bnwoclitty
he/they
they havent found out about the 2nd urgentcord yet
Aedra
Well-known schlogga
PM's like these lead to cliques that overall harm discussion around the forum. So I'm in favor of nuking such conversations, I've always been. I pushed for nuking the first urgentcord too.
WHO was it then?
we need to know
SmallAnus
User has a large penis
I think by red janny he means an admin. so probably broot
- Status
Similar threads
