thread_prefix.20 What brain do you have?

[FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte]

This came to me after I had a dream and I should've written it down because now I've forgotten quite a bit.

I had a dream that someone wrote a paper about the four different brains an individual can possess and that this not only relates to the psychological and pathological but also the intelligence of someone, what makes up the characteristics of that persons brain just by which axis they genetically or naturally (nature versus nuture) predisposed to.

Y-Axis (the left side of the brain is How), X-Axis (the right side of your brain is What), Z-Axis is the most intelligent (this type of brain asks Why), and although there is no fourth axis, (the least intelligent asks Huh). I remember in the dream the fourth brain was given a specific name but I can't remember what they called it. There were also drawings of faces ascribed to these different intelligences and brain types.

 

[FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte]

Also no.. you can't let Doll decide for you, unfortunately.

 

[baqqrih]

Wouldn't everyone but absolute dunces have a "why" brain? There's a clear hierarchy of thought complexity in this psychological model that I believe most people of the general population would reach the height of, as the "huh" is simply observing something, the "what" is observing and processing it, the "how" is observing, processing, and analyzing it, and the "why" is doing all of those things and then connecting it to surrounding occurrences. Hence, it's the simple action of complex thought. Is that a correct interpretation? If so, I'd say that the model seems redundant.

 

[FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte]

Wouldn't everyone but absolute dunces have a "why" brain? There's a clear hierarchy of thought complexity in this psychological model that I believe most people of the general population would reach the height of, as the "huh" is simply observing something, the "what" is observing and processing it, the "how" is observing, processing, and analyzing it, and the "why" is doing all of those things and then connecting it to surrounding occurrences. Hence, it's the simple action of complex thought. Is that a correct interpretation? If so, I'd say that the model seems redundant.

Noooo you weren't supposed to give a reasonable, rational, intelligent and thought-provoking response to a retarded poll about a stupid incomprehensible dream, noooooooooo