- Joined
- Mar 6, 2024
- Messages
- 4,092
Is this true from what you've seen? I don't really watch movies but it struck me as funny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's not that "if it doesn't do this, it was directed by a man" but rather, "if it does do this, it's directed by a woman"American Psycho doesn't do this and it was directed by a woman
Women are good at directing degenerate and obscene media btwAmerican Psycho doesn't do this and it was directed by a woman
That’s because everyone (except the homo) is the good guyAmerican Psycho doesn't do this and it was directed by a woman
try watching one sometimeI don't watch movies, sorry
People typically phrase this asymmetry using the terms like "necessary" and "sufficient". You could phrase the statement as you have conveyed it as "A Female director is necessary but not sufficient for a movie to have frequently speechless antagonists."It's not that "if it doesn't do this, it was directed by a man" but rather, "if it does do this, it's directed by a woman"
There is definitely a simpler way of saying that but I don't know how to.