Discussion Should the ban megathread be locked and public ban discussion be disallowed?

[Pepsilord]

I feel like a lot of drama has occurred simply because bans are being publicly discussed instead of privately through DMs or Email.

I don’t think the site benefits from public discussion of this or that guy being banned. If you have an issue or want further info, you can always privately message a moderator, instead of starting some SNCA drama.

What do you guys think?

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

I feel like a lot of drama has occurred simply because bans are being publicly discussed instead of privately through DMs or Email.

I don’t think the site benefits from public discussion of this or that guy being banned. If you have an issue or want further info, you can always privately message a moderator, instead of starting some SNCA drama.

What do you guys think?

Well since we have removed the bans list and have now made our decisions and bans on accounts private that thread you are referring to is useless except for drama and controversy (why we removed the band list) I was thinking days ago when we did this of locking the Megabans thread for this reason

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

niggas can't handle discussion smh

 

[Starbing_Artiste]

bruh now i gotta go to the 'farms to figure out all the drama i missed it's over

 

[jimbo]

I feel like a lot of drama has occurred simply because bans are being publicly discussed instead of privately through DMs or Email.

I don’t think the site benefits from public discussion of this or that guy being banned. If you have an issue or want further info, you can always privately message a moderator, instead of starting some SNCA drama.

What do you guys think?

drama is good for this site oldfaggot

 

[Stephen]

Rulecucked, do we really need *more* rules?
@MoonMetropolis GTFIH

 

[1844 or Something]

Nah

Thread has been locked for further replies

 

[Watt]

Rulecucked, do we really need *more* rules?

yes

 

[Thrembolone]

It creates more activity which is good though

 

[Pepsilord]

drama is good for this site oldfaggot

Who're you calling an oldfaggot nigger? I'm only 70 years old! That's young!

 

[MoonMetropolis]

I feel like a lot of drama has occurred simply because bans are being publicly discussed instead of privately through DMs or Email.

I don’t think the site benefits from public discussion of this or that guy being banned. If you have an issue or want further info, you can always privately message a moderator, instead of starting some SNCA drama.

What do you guys think?

 

[Pepsilord]

View attachment 125443

Jealous of my BBC

 

[TurkBVLL]

@Pepsilord @greg @Soyteen Liker Kill yourself

 

[Sneedson]

Drama, whether you like it or not, is the main reason this forum gets any consistent activity whatsoever, there's a reason why /incel/ is the second largest board in terms of posts on the Schlog besides /you/, couple that with the forum's laxed rules regarding quality posts and any thread that involves these things is bound to get up to 20 pages in under an half an hour, (which also makes this site unique from other forums, more notably kiwi farms).

If you look at the majority of the post history of the top 5 users with the most posts, I can guarantee you that 99% of it doesn't come from serious discussion regarding social, economic or political issues or even joke threads speculating which ethnic group of women have the best tasting breast milk, it's mostly from arguing or shit flinging over SNCA.

 

[Thrembolone]

>why are people discussing namefags on the namefag splinter

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

Drama was so rare back then. I remember people obsessed over princessparkles in her journal but that was it. Ever since September the site was on a downwards spiral and it didn't help a lot of users joined after Terrycrews joined so drama is the norm for them. Who cares if the site loses most of its pph. I want quality not quantity. I'm tired of drama threads for posts for a lifetime after this week

tbh i thought the drama was entertaining for a bit until it was too constant

 

[Gem Control]

tbh i like drama

Wherever there are namefags, there is drama

 

[TurkBVLL]

Drama was so rare back then. I remember people obsessed over princessparkles in her journal but that was it. Ever since September the site was on a downwards spiral and it didn't help a lot of users joined after Terrycrews joined so drama is the norm for them. Who cares if the site loses most of its pph. I want quality not quantity. I'm tired of drama threads for posts for a lifetime after this week

If you don't want to deal with drama then you're gonna have to put the mop down. As long as namefags exist the tranitors will always have to deal with drama, ban list or not.

 

[XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX]

Drama was so rare back then. I remember people obsessed over princessparkles in her journal but that was it. Ever since September the site was on a downwards spiral and it didn't help a lot of users joined after Terrycrews joined so drama is the norm for them. Who cares if the site loses most of its pph. I want quality not quantity. I'm tired of drama threads for posts for a lifetime after this week

This sites current-era has good things about it too, like BBC Hitler threads.

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

I agree but there's a lot of drama and shitflinging

the drama here is not what it was back then.

this seems rather tame compared to when terry first joined the schlog