Racism is retarded
- Thread starter FrogKing
- Start date
>I don't think I have to say anymore than the title. There isn't any proper reason to hate other races. And Africa is a thriving nation.
14NateHiggers88
2024 oldGOD
My highschool was half black. It was eye opening how retarded and impulse driven most of them are. Those people will never amount to anything, it was insane to go to the same school as them. Thankfully it was segregated, between those who wanted to learn and those who didn't give a rats ass. I have no idea why people insist that the only reason black do worse than whites is due to racism when 95% of them are retarded apes.
Last edited:
FrogKing
antiwhite and proud
You are literally a zelligtroon
N
NekoRightsActivist
Guest
race doesn't have anything to do with that, it's the culture, and modern amerishart consooming culture isn't known for cultivating gentlemen.
X
X Immigrant
Guest
It 'cultivates' pajeets for some reason.
FrogKing
antiwhite and proud
A
Aedra
Guest
Race, as an idea is something that came out of western civilization first and foremost. Therefore the amount of value you attach to it should depend on whether you like western civilization or not. Different civilizations have different truths from their perspective, this is not to say objective truth does not exist, it does. My primary point is, since I see absolutely no value in western civilization, I see no value in race as a concept either. I don't have to operate by these vague, weirdly defined way of categorizing people in the same way I don't have to accept LGBT propaganda coming from the west. Nowadays the westerners who strongly believe in ideologies surrounding race seem to use it more as a tool of mental masturbation if anything. You convince yourself that you're superior and think of yourself as the highest form of humanity, you look at yourself in the mirror in your hubris and think your good looks, pale skin and height amount to anything. But God says the opposite. You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of doing so. These ideas do not exist in most other civilizations, such as mine. It's the relative truth of a pathetic, heretical "civilization" that cannot cope with the fact that it lost, it is especially laughable to see westerners insult Russia by saying they behave like mongols or are not white or whatever. As if they give a flying fuck about your conception of them.
But in reality, one can easily see that race ideologies of today are quite pathetic compared to the ones in the past. In the past, the standards for what constitutes a pure white man would be more strict, slavs wouldn't pass, neither would Italians or the Irish for example. But nowadays white nationalists include either most or all of those in that definition. This is because they are weak and attempt to compensate for it by broadening the scope of the concept of whiteness to gain more followers.
If the ideology of race was so pure, perfect and flawless, then racists would not give up on their core principles just to stay relevant. That in itself throws a wrench in its legitimacy. Maybe tomorrow many of you will also say Turks and Syrians are white too, kek.
But in reality, one can easily see that race ideologies of today are quite pathetic compared to the ones in the past. In the past, the standards for what constitutes a pure white man would be more strict, slavs wouldn't pass, neither would Italians or the Irish for example. But nowadays white nationalists include either most or all of those in that definition. This is because they are weak and attempt to compensate for it by broadening the scope of the concept of whiteness to gain more followers.
If the ideology of race was so pure, perfect and flawless, then racists would not give up on their core principles just to stay relevant. That in itself throws a wrench in its legitimacy. Maybe tomorrow many of you will also say Turks and Syrians are white too, kek.
X
X Immigrant
Guest
Do you really want everyone looking like a mutt, Aedra? I don't get it. The preservation of races is vital for culture but you're openly applauding one's decline.
And about your 'decreasing standards' the standards are in fact increasing. Pre-900s Germanics, Slavs, and Celts were allied peoples. Only after the mongol raids and the U.K were they unnaturally separated.
And about your 'decreasing standards' the standards are in fact increasing. Pre-900s Germanics, Slavs, and Celts were allied peoples. Only after the mongol raids and the U.K were they unnaturally separated.
A
Aedra
Guest
The idea of race was invented gradually in the 1700's or so. People prior to that didn't care about any of these concepts. Tsar Peter the Great adopted one of those negroes you despise so much as his own godson, namely Abram Petrovich Gannibal. Enslaved by the Ottomans at first, and then rescued, baptized, and adopted by Holy Russia. Then Alexander Pushkin was one of his great grandsons, Alexander would go on to become one of the greatest poets in Russian history, usually dubbed the founder of modern Russian literature. Is your country's literature of African origin then? Your answer is of course no, right? Mine is too. Because race is bullshit, people of the past were extremely xenophobic of course and that's a good thing, but not racist, because this concept is made up and didn't exist for most of history.
Btw, Abram Petrovich was married off to a scandinavian princess and made over 10 children with her, germanic cucks may seethe.
X
X Immigrant
Guest
Wowzers! Tsar Peter was a fucking idiot who tried to appeal to the west, of course he'd do that. And Pushkin has mostly European traits.
Nigger...during one of the first known instances of contact between whites(Carthagenians) and blacks in the West African coast, the Carthagenians skinned them and displayed their skins on a monument. We don't usually mix. There are exceptions but physiological identity is a core value of humanity, and when it's lost like in America and some instances in Western Europe, civilization declines.
A
Aedra
Guest
>he did that to appeal to the west even doe the west was extremely racist at that time
Nice logic man, I'm not in the mood for arguing so I'll leave it at this. You can think whatever you will. But whenever you feel I'm truly in the wrong, remind yourself of 1 Samuel 16:7, alright? God bless.
X
X Immigrant
Guest
So was Russia. There were multiple black noblemen in English and European society.
You know, I didn't even bring up hating niggers. What I did bring up was that race is an inherent part of culture, which is why we shouldn't interbreed en masse and preserve our respective races.
14NateHiggers88
2024 oldGOD
At least the white and asian kids pretended to work. Niggers are retarded monkeys and this is why they were enslaved by every other group of people that encountered them.
FrogKing
antiwhite and proud
>Tranime poster
FrogKing
antiwhite and proud
Aa poorly sourced voyage done by a king isn't proof that race is inherent to humanity
nagolbud
Chudarisee
German anatomist Johann Blumenbach visited the Caucasus Mountains, located between the Caspian and Black seas, and he must have been enchanted because he labeled the people there “Caucasians” and proposed that they were created in God’s image as an ideal form of humanity.
The U.S. legal system made use of Blumenbach’s taxonomy. As early as 1790 the first naturalization law was passed, preventing foreigners who were not white from becoming citizens. But according to Mukhopadhyay, Blumenbach’s category of “Caucasian” posed a problem because his classification of white also included some North Africans, Armenians, Persians, Arabs, and North Indians. The definition of Caucasian had to be reinvented to focus the ideological category of whiteness on northern and western Europe. The term, even though its exact definition changed over time, was used to shape legal policy and the nature of our society.
As new immigrants began to stream into the country in the 20th century, political leaders and scientists supported a new racial science called eugenics that built on 19th-century notions of race.
The study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. Developed largely by Sir Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, eugenics was increasingly discredited as unscientific and racially biased during the 20th century, especially after the adoption of its doctrines by the Nazis.
The U.S. legal system made use of Blumenbach’s taxonomy. As early as 1790 the first naturalization law was passed, preventing foreigners who were not white from becoming citizens. But according to Mukhopadhyay, Blumenbach’s category of “Caucasian” posed a problem because his classification of white also included some North Africans, Armenians, Persians, Arabs, and North Indians. The definition of Caucasian had to be reinvented to focus the ideological category of whiteness on northern and western Europe. The term, even though its exact definition changed over time, was used to shape legal policy and the nature of our society.
As new immigrants began to stream into the country in the 20th century, political leaders and scientists supported a new racial science called eugenics that built on 19th-century notions of race.
The study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. Developed largely by Sir Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, eugenics was increasingly discredited as unscientific and racially biased during the 20th century, especially after the adoption of its doctrines by the Nazis.
FrogKing
antiwhite and proud
ChatGPT ahh post
Even if you’re not racist you have to realize that races cannot coexist with each other. Mixed race kids are much more prone to developing diseases compared to their purebred counterparts. And racial conflict is a never ending struggle. Separating everyone to their own land would be a net positive for every human.
