most SOVLFVL period in history

I

istanbul

Guest
The 80s were a terrible decade. I wish I could've been born in the 1930s
1719588108262.png
 
>I wanna live during the Great Depression and ww2 just like my favorite superheros
this but unironically
my grandpa was an unbothered manual worker living in a small inland town where nothing ever happened, I would give anything to live an existence as comfy as the one he got the opportunity to experience
 
The 80s were a terrible decade. I wish I could've been born in the 1930s
View attachment 14216
Yep, I agree. The 80s seem like the center point for boomer/gen-X degeneracy. Very strong culture of drugs, sex, and homosexual musicians. Negroes began to really influence the popular culture at this point too. But then why is this post titled "The most SOVLFVL period in history"? Are you asking us

Most SOVLFVL period in history probably hmmm probably the renaissance. I mean, duh? Is this even a challenge? If you ever go to Rome or Florence you'll realize this. Baroque is trying too hard, it's too flashy. 1700s Neoclassical is not bad but too tame to be soulful. Romantic period has soul but it is only reactionary towards the dirt of industrialization. Ancient Greece gives Renaissance a challenge but the Renaissance is ultimately the completion of the aesthetic ideals of the Greeks and the Germanics. The masculine and the feminine. When I saw Florence, I wished for a moment that the city was in ruins, because even in ruins it would leave behind something utterly beautiful. Dark Souls is what you get when you put a post-apocalyptic game in Italy instead of some American shithole city designed by Frankfurt Jews.
 
Yep, I agree. The 80s seem like the center point for boomer/gen-X degeneracy. Very strong culture of drugs, sex, and homosexual musicians. Negroes began to really influence the popular culture at this point too. But then why is this post titled "The most SOVLFVL period in history"? Are you asking us

Most SOVLFVL period in history probably hmmm probably the renaissance. I mean, duh? Is this even a challenge? If you ever go to Rome or Florence you'll realize this. Baroque is trying too hard, it's too flashy. 1700s Neoclassical is not bad but too tame to be soulful. Romantic period has soul but it is only reactionary towards the dirt of industrialization. Ancient Greece gives Renaissance a challenge but the Renaissance is ultimately the completion of the aesthetic ideals of the Greeks and the Germanics. The masculine and the feminine. When I saw Florence, I wished for a moment that the city was in ruins, because even in ruins it would leave behind something utterly beautiful. Dark Souls is what you get when you put a post-apocalyptic game in Italy instead of some American shithole city designed by Frankfurt Jews.
It's a bit of an exaggeration on my part, I will admit. When I made the post I was mostly thinking about the USA-USSR rivalry and how we will never again get anything like that again. It is a world that is gone forever.
 
Colombia is first world o algo according to this image? The more you know
"First world" didn't have the same meaning during the cold war than what it means now. "First world" simply meant "anti-communist", second world meant "pro-communist", and third world meant CGTOW (countries going their own way)
After the USSR fell, first world meant developed, second world meant developing, and third world meant undeveloped.
 
Back
Top