IWABAW

It's been kind of amusing, from a distance, to watch JK Rowling melt down over men in dresses invading women's private spaces.

She still doesn't get it.

She doesn't understand that first they came for the men. Only then, much later, did they come for the women.

She doesn't understand that "transwomen" are simply doing to women what feminists did to men decades earlier.

First feminists demanded inclusion in men's private, unisex environments. Then they demanded that those spaces be changed to suit them. Then they demanded that no male-only space exist, anywhere.

And the cosmic irony of all of this is that this is a large part of the reason why "transwomen" exist in the first place.

Boys raised without any spaces or groups for boys. Raised without any acknowledgement, or accommodation, for the sex-specific needs of boys. Boys raised solely by women, in environments designed for girls, treated as defective girls, medicated into insensibility with modified methamphetamine if they dare to act like boys.

And then told, from an age far too young for psychological self-defense, that men are responsible for all the world's ills, and girls are wonderful and can do no wrong, and can do everything they can do, backwards and in heels.

And still Rowling is surprised when some of them grow up wanting to be girls, and move into the women-only spaces, which were never abolished when the men-only spaces were?

She was smart enough to write a really good series of children's books, but not smart enough to understand the high-order consequences of her own ideology.

It's so incredibly, mind-bendingly delicious to watch. This tranny apocalypse is the result of a chain of events that feminists themselves set in motion, using the same tactics and arguments against them that they used against men.

They are being punished not only for their sins, but by their sins.

So what is the point of this rant? I just wanted to say thank you, trannies. You ruined leftism for even normies and will cause its fall. You go girl.
 
Aedra said:
It's been kind of amusing, from a distance, to watch JK Rowling melt down over men in dresses invading women's private spaces.

She still doesn't get it.

She doesn't understand that first they came for the men. Only then, much later, did they come for the women.

She doesn't understand that "transwomen" are simply doing to women what feminists did to men decades earlier.

First feminists demanded inclusion in men's private, unisex environments. Then they demanded that those spaces be changed to suit them. Then they demanded that no male-only space exist, anywhere.

And the cosmic irony of all of this is that this is a large part of the reason why "transwomen" exist in the first place.

Boys raised without any spaces or groups for boys. Raised without any acknowledgement, or accommodation, for the sex-specific needs of boys. Boys raised solely by women, in environments designed for girls, treated as defective girls, medicated into insensibility with modified methamphetamine if they dare to act like boys.

And then told, from an age far too young for psychological self-defense, that men are responsible for all the world's ills, and girls are wonderful and can do no wrong, and can do everything they can do, backwards and in heels.

And still Rowling is surprised when some of them grow up wanting to be girls, and move into the women-only spaces, which were never abolished when the men-only spaces were?

She was smart enough to write a really good series of children's books, but not smart enough to understand the high-order consequences of her own ideology.

It's so incredibly, mind-bendingly delicious to watch. This tranny apocalypse is the result of a chain of events that feminists themselves set in motion, using the same tactics and arguments against them that they used against men.

They are being punished not only for their sins, but by their sins.

So what is the point of this rant? I just wanted to say thank you, trannies. You ruined leftism for even normies and will cause its fall. You go girl.
Click to expand...
ok tbh i’ve never seen anything from this perspective so was actually an interesting read

i don’t get what you mean by earlier feminism forcing women into men’s spaces before though - it doesn’t make sense to me
feminism was because of men taking advantage of women constantly and the abuse, no?
from a woman’s viewpoint men still have the freedom in this world because are more physically able to defend themselves

also “boys raised in environments for women” can you please give me an example for this??

and really i don’t think fighting for an equal right to do the same types of work/vote the same and have the opportunity to present ourselves the same as men is comparable to a mentally ill man wanting to change his gender

and the trans community is always saying gender roles don’t matter - so with this argument are they wrong? are they doing this bc of gender roles or do they want the body

ik this was ur rant but im genuinely kinda interested now
 
vx5590 said:
TRANS WOMEN ARE WOMEN
Click to expand...
IMG_1327.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top