I'm gonna derail for a moment because imaginary numbers are a real thing they just exist off of the normal number line so I hate seeing it used as an example. If reals ran from left to right, the square root of negative 1 (definition of imaginary) would have it run up and down (anything that's a multiplication of the two forms is a complex), its a dumb name that was coined by a man who wanted to discount their legitimacy, while they ended up being a real thing and are used in the real world the name stuck.>CHUD NO SCIENCE IS CONSISTENT WE JUST HAVE TO MAKE "IMAGINARY NUMBERS" AND "ANTI-MATTER" INSTEAD OF ADMITTING THAT OUR MODEL IS FLAWED
its just a joke nigga dont take it too seriouslyI'm gonna derail for a moment because imaginary numbers are a real thing they just exist off of the normal number line so I hate seeing it used as an example. If reals ran from left to right, the square root of negative 1 (definition of imaginary) would have it run up and down (anything that's a multiplication of the two forms is a complex), its a dumb name that was coined by a man who wanted to discount their legitimacy, while they ended up being a real thing and are used in the real world the name stuck.
also how do i greentext
Shame on you for spoonfeeding me.
You've only named scientists from hundreds of years ago. Most recent scientists that worked on space programmes have been atheists.I cannot name a single great scientist who was an atheist. Newton, Faraday, and Euler were Christians. Even Muslims have some scientists, like Al Khwarizmi. No atheists. Even the more recent ones aren't comfortable calling themselves atheists, preferring the title of agnostic (like Einstein). The only atheist scientists are pop-scientists appeasing Redditors and PhD's built for TSP (Tiny Soyboy Pecker). Also, Neil deGrasse Nigger is not a scientist.