is it immoral to engineer conflicts in third world countries to profit off of them?

[Hagon]

i ask because being a war profiteer is my dream

 

[baqqrih]

I'd say it is, yeah.

 

[Hagon]

I'd say it is, yeah.

baited nobody award

 

[Stephen]

No because the free market will find the most efficient way of waging the war, thus allowing to end the quickest

 

[Chairman]

Maybe, but if you do those kinds of things you'd be called Rabbi Hagon.

 

[ILoveCoals]

No because the free market will find the most efficient way of waging the war, thus allowing to end the quickest

Spoken like a true American patriQt

 

[Hagon]

No because the free market will find the most efficient way of waging the war, thus allowing to end the quickest

I plan to play both sides and prolong the war as long as possible doe

 

[ILoveCoals]

I plan to play both sides and prolong the war as long as possible doe

 

[Chairman]

I plan to play both sides and prolong the war as long as possible doe.

You are in no position of power to engineer any wars. At least become a military officer first.

 

[Stephen]

I plan to play both sides and prolong the war as long as possible doe

This even doe you’re probably dumb enough to accidentally shorten the war

 

[Swede]

It's not cool and ruining lives of millions or something

 

[Gemerald]

no because the people who live in third world countries are subhuman, otherwise they wouldnt be third world

 

[1844 or something]

If it's a third-world country, chances are your conflict isn't going to make much difference to them.
If anything, you're causing more deaths which will prevent those people from starving or dying of AIDs much more slowly.

 

['gatorfag sl33p]

Horrible idea simply because migration becomes a thing, and you know the rest, and don't forget that crafting conflicts to leech wealth out of shitholes is only at best a medium range profit that easily gets sweep by better immoral ways like giving them enough resources to exist and be exploited without sounding like a dictatorship.