Rant I want to fucking strangle the sharty jannies

Soynic Hedgehog

México es blanco o algo
I just caught a RULE FUCKING ONE PERMABAN with no linked post after making a thread equivocating people who are pro rape with people that are pro pedophila.
Here are the only posts in the thread I made. I know it was this thread because I posted a few times in it before being quickly banned
1:
1723862770936.png

2:
1723862886877.png

Replying to:
1723862914775.png

3:
1723862976817.png


My theory is that janny saw post #2 and very conveniently forgot to read the "thats no different than saying" part of the post and assumed I was advocating for pedophiles. I knew it could be mistaken for that which is why I added explicit context that I was trying to demonstrate his logic sounds like something you would hear out of a pedophile trying to downplay their pedophilia. As an aside I am kind of being a retard in that post by saying rape was no better than CSA, obviously CSA is worse, but I just had it out for rapetroons at that time so I exagerated a little. That however is irrelevant the elephant in the room of janny accusing me out of nowhere of breaking rule 1, which I will promptly get back to.

Yeah, so this faggot didn't even accuse me of breaking rule 2, you know, the rule that could best be argued in janny's favor for mistaking me for breaking? No, this nigger banned me under ASKING FOR OR POSTING CP! What the fuck? AND you can see this actual pedophilic poster here (who I was about to dunk on by the way before getting banned)
1723864177082.png

whose ban is snug up against mine on the banpage for RULE 2. Janny specifically picked the worst possible ban reason that you could give someone, also the biggest middle finger you could give to a longtime poster on the site who has stuck with it for nearly its whole life and cares greatly about it's prosperity.
Not to discredit myself, and call me a schizo if I am being schizo here, but does this suggest foul play on the part of the moderator? It seems too stupid and egregious and overboard to be a mistake. I did go pretty hard on froot in a big meta thread I had made just before this one so you never know.

It goes without saying that I wrote a very long and angry appeal about how dissapointed I was that moderators could be this hamfisted and retarded. It is still pending.

I have caught false bans before but this one offends me more than any one in the past. If you get banned falsely under rule 1 and janny ignores your appeal (If they are dumb/devious enough to hand out bans like this I wouldn't put it past them) You are FUCKED. So obviously I am more than a little pissed off by this.
 
That brings to mind a time where a frind of mine asked chatgpt to come up with made up zoomerspeak words
1723865970587.png

Certainly this thread is flopty AF, but I don't know if it's just a wubba or if its a major gromp.
 
I just caught a RULE FUCKING ONE PERMABAN with no linked post after making a thread equivocating people who are pro rape with people that are pro pedophila.
Here are the only posts in the thread I made. I know it was this thread because I posted a few times in it before being quickly banned
1:
View attachment 30144
2:
View attachment 30145
Replying to:
View attachment 30146
3:View attachment 30147

My theory is that janny saw post #2 and very conveniently forgot to read the "thats no different than saying" part of the post and assumed I was advocating for pedophiles. I knew it could be mistaken for that which is why I added explicit context that I was trying to demonstrate his logic sounds like something you would hear out of a pedophile trying to downplay their pedophilia. As an aside I am kind of being a retard in that post by saying rape was no better than CSA, obviously CSA is worse, but I just had it out for rapetroons at that time so I exagerated a little. That however is irrelevant the elephant in the room of janny accusing me out of nowhere of breaking rule 1, which I will promptly get back to.

Yeah, so this faggot didn't even accuse me of breaking rule 2, you know, the rule that could best be argued in janny's favor for mistaking me for breaking? No, this nigger banned me under ASKING FOR OR POSTING CP! What the fuck? AND you can see this actual pedophilic poster here (who I was about to dunk on by the way before getting banned)
View attachment 30152
whose ban is snug up against mine on the banpage for RULE 2. Janny specifically picked the worst possible ban reason that you could give someone, also the biggest middle finger you could give to a longtime poster on the site who has stuck with it for nearly its whole life and cares greatly about it's prosperity.
Not to discredit myself, and call me a schizo if I am being schizo here, but does this suggest foul play on the part of the moderator? It seems too stupid and egregious and overboard to be a mistake. I did go pretty hard on froot in a big meta thread I had made just before this one so you never know.

It goes without saying that I wrote a very long and angry appeal about how dissapointed I was that moderators could be this hamfisted and retarded. It is still pending.

I have caught false bans before but this one offends me more than any one in the past. If you get banned falsely under rule 1 and janny ignores your appeal (If they are dumb/devious enough to hand out bans like this I wouldn't put it past them) You are FUCKED. So obviously I am more than a little pissed off by this.
Feels like you are concern trolling just so you can talk about rape in a roundabout way. You are hiding behind the shield of being against it despite no one talking about it. Haven't been on da 'arty in a little bit, but they didn't talk about rape that much and I doubt it changed that much.
>Ba da jannies
Jannies are faggot froot worshipers who eat poop, they are bad. Not a big surprise.
>nub@bas (there is a filter)
The state of soyspeak is disgraceful. This isn't soyspeak, its some 'cord twitter speak.
tldr:
 
Don't really use sharty but I'd like to strangle 'ru jannies, those niggers just let another soytranny p0rn passed (no I'm not going to link it here, go check for it yourself). ffs xhey should've just unified with jartycucks at this stage.
edit: it's one p0rn and 2 fetish brimstones, fuck 'ru janniggers.
 
You got autobanned. These used to show up as system instead of mod on the public ban list but we changed it to make it harder for CSAM spammers to figure out if they'd been banned by a human or tripped an autoban filter.
That being said, the phrase you used that triggered it being a rule 1 ban doesn't make much sense so I'll change it to autoban for rule 3 instead.
 
You got autobanned. These used to show up as system instead of mod on the public ban list but we changed it to make it harder for CSAM spammers to figure out if they'd been banned by a human or tripped an autoban filter.
That being said, the phrase you used that triggered it being a rule 1 ban doesn't make much sense so I'll change it to autoban for rule 3 instead.
Yesterday i posted in a /qa/ thread about some foid who sent pictures of her tits last year and then got banned for rule 1. I figured it was a filter but i didn't know what it was for, thanks for explaining
 
Yesterday i posted in a /qa/ thread about some foid who sent pictures of her tits last year and then got banned for rule 1. I figured it was a filter but i didn't know what it was for, thanks for explaining
Yeah I was the one unbanning you there, the catbox links were what kept getting you banned.
 
Feels like you are concern trolling just so you can talk about rape in a roundabout way. You are hiding behind the shield of being against it despite no one talking about it. Haven't been on da 'arty in a little bit, but they didn't talk about rape that much and I doubt it changed that much.
>Ba da jannies
Jannies are faggot froot worshipers who eat poop, they are bad. Not a big surprise.
>nub@bas (there is a filter)
The state of soyspeak is disgraceful. This isn't soyspeak, its some 'cord twitter speak.
tldr:

Feels like you are concern trolling just so you can talk about rape in a roundabout way. You are hiding behind the shield of being against it despite no one talking about it
Have you been on the sharty for the last year or so? The whole rape thing is a popular meme there nowadays. They were irratating me last night so I wanted to shit on them.
>unironically using the "if you don't like it you must secretly like it" talking point
If I liked rape I would talk about it openly because it is vouge on there to talk about your rape fetish

>The state of soyspeak is disgraceful. This isn't soyspeak, its some 'cord twitter speak.
I agree. Oldfag and Newfag were filtered as a statement quite early on in the sharty's life, because at the time the sharty's whole identity was being a rebelion against 4chan and its culture. 4cucks are obsessed with seniority and hate newfags. When the sharty was young everyone was obsessed with shilling it as hard as possible to as many people as possible, to both rebel against 4cuck literally in the site numbers sense and rebel in the philosophical sense. This is why newfag=newGOD and oldfag=oldCHAD.
I suppose unsuprisingly doing literally everything in their power to be the opposite of 4cuck was a very retarded and hamfisted MO and the shilling campaigns brought in newfags from backgrounds such as RW twitter and youtube, who, only understanding the site's culture at the surface level they gleamed from seeing only the most generic sharty content on their own platforms, quickly outnumbered the native userbase into being a minority on the website, which naturally caused the site culture to completely move on without the actual soyteens that built it. The newfags steadily replaced the oldfags, and never being a minority (as newfags should always be) were never pressured to actually integrate with the oldfags. Because its an anonymous imageboard, whichever group has the most numbers will take the reigns of its community and culture. This is one of the reasons why the sharty has become bland and uninventive now, because 90% of the userbase only understands the sharty on the surface level the gleamed from their incomprehensable whoajacks or their hyperborean chudjak larp videos. The sharty made a mistake by branching its advertisment and publicity stunts beyond the chansphere, and in their need to oppose every part of the 4cuck philosophy subjected themselves to the same rot that they splintered from 4chan to escape. The sharty is basically 4cuck tier slop except that its free from the 4cuck mod team and also keeps out tranime pedos.
Also another giant injury to the site is the rise of froot as admin. Froot is the quintisential twitter discord immigrant newfag. So when you have a site that is now predominantly newfags, and you give the site on a silver platter to newfags, you basically have a sharty that is not the sharty anymore. Complete userbase and administration replacement.
Thats the reason why froot is popular as he is by the way, even though old sharty would probably hate him. Because both the replacment admin and replacement userbase come from the same stock.
 
Last edited:
Have you been on the sharty for the last year or so? The whole rape thing is a popular meme there nowadays. They were irratating me last night so I wanted to shit on them.
>unironically using the "if you don't like it you must secretly like it" talking point
If I liked rape I would talk about it openly because it is vouge on there to talk about your rape fetish

>The state of soyspeak is disgraceful. This isn't soyspeak, its some 'cord twitter speak.
I agree. Oldfag and Newfag were filtered as a statement quite early on in the sharty's life, because at the time the sharty's whole identity was being a rebelion against 4chan and its culture. 4cucks are obsessed with seniority and hate newfags. When the sharty was young everyone was obsessed with shilling it as hard as possible to as many people as possible, to both rebel against 4cuck literally in the site numbers sense and rebel in the philosophical sense. This is why newfag=newGOD and oldfag=oldCHAD.
I suppose unsuprisingly doing literally everything in their power to be the opposite of 4cuck was a very retarded and hamfisted MO and the shilling campaigns brought in newfags from backgrounds such as RW twitter and youtube, who, only understanding the site's culture at the surface level they gleamed from seeing only the most generic sharty content on their own platforms, quickly outnumbered the native userbase into being a minority on the website, which naturally caused the site culture to completely move on without the actual soyteens that built it. The newfags steadily replaced the oldfags, and never being a minority (as newfags should always be) were never pressured to actually integrate with the oldfags. Because its an anonymous imageboard, whichever group has the most numbers will take the reigns of its community and culture. This is one of the reasons why the sharty has become bland and uninventive now, because 90% of the userbase only understands the sharty on the surface level the gleamed from their incomprehensable whoajacks or their hyperborean chudjak larp videos. The sharty made a mistake by branching its advertisment and publicity stunts beyond the chansphere, and in their need to oppose every part of the 4cuck philosophy subjected themselves to the same rot that they splintered from 4chan to escape. The sharty is basically 4cuck tier slop except that its free from the 4cuck mod team and also keeps out tranime pedos.
Also another giant injury to the site is the rise of froot as admin. Froot is the quintisential twitter discord immigrant newfag. So when you have a site that is now predominantly newfags, and you give the site on a silver platter to newfags, you basically have a sharty that is not the sharty anymore. Complete userbase and administration replacement.
Thats the reason why froot is popular as he is by the way, even though old sharty would probably hate him. Because both the replacment admin and replacement userbase come from the same stock.
>IT'S DA NOOOOOOFAGZ
4cuck.gif
 
Back
Top