Chud Don't Be a 'One-Dimensional Man'

Linked a book by a guy who advocated for the suppression of speech he didn't like award
You're the one-dimensional man aka normie, he speaks AGAINST... work on your reading comprehension.

Marcuse was not an orthodox Marxist. Marcuse wrote of "critical theory" not of "Marxism"..
In his written works, he criticized capitalism, modern technology, Soviet Communism, and popular culture, arguing that they represent new forms of social control.
 
You're the one-dimensional man aka normie, he speaks AGAINST... work on your reading comprehension.

Marcuse was not an orthodox Marxist. Marcuse wrote of "critical theory" not of "Marxism"..
In his written works, he criticized capitalism, modern technology, Soviet Communism, and popular culture, arguing that they represent new forms of social control.
Link popular culture control article.
 
He doesn't know:
"Marcuse argues that "the realization of the objective of tolerance" requires "intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed." He makes the case for "liberating tolerance", which would consist of intolerance to right-wing movements and toleration of left-wing movements."
 
Link popular culture control article.
It's a book literally AGAINST popular culture... promoting individualism, critical thinking, and philosophy. Ya'll really struggle with reading...
@Broot You gotta teach your soyjakkers how to read... or is this part of your tyrannical rule?
He doesn't know:
"Marcuse argues that "the realization of the objective of tolerance" requires "intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed." He makes the case for "liberating tolerance", which would consist of intolerance to right-wing movements and toleration of left-wing movements."
Retard googles a name instead of reading what he has to say... and only a retard takes the opinion of another on another as fact.
Also, just because you disagree with one line you read on reddit doesn't disregard his other philosophical ideas....

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Unknown
 
"We submit to the peaceful production of the means of destruction, to the perfection of waste, to being educated for a defense which deforms the defenders and that which they defend." - Herbert Marcuse
 
Last edited:
Be a zero-dimensional man instead
Gray man.
That's pretty much how I live. No fancy jewels, no fancy clothes, all my shirts are just basic colors with no logos. I can go un-detected even in Mexico as a gringo... never a good idea to draw attention to yourself.
 
I trannyheart nagolbud. This is a very important issue.

However, I want to dispute the single-body individualist perspective. If you can achieve a unique and authentic personality through a cluster of people, that is respectable mode of differentiation. The individualist perspective fails to recognize the value of these instances because the personality is not individual in the sense of being indivisible. You can read about ex-Zendik cultists who left and differentiated widely- one becoming an alt-right tw*tter user, dystopian author and eventually a murderer. (for personal grievances- based!) He died by cop which is cool. He was on a podcast with a leftist female friend of his who was also ex-Zendik and they considered themselves to always be Zendik because it was such an experience. Obviously there are degrading (and worse, anti-generative) aspects of cults in the contemporary implementation and but I don't know why it has to be like this.
 
I trannyheart nagolbud. This is a very important issue.

However, I want to dispute the single-body individualist perspective. If you can achieve a unique and authentic personality through a cluster of people, that is respectable mode of differentiation. The individualist perspective fails to recognize the value of these instances because the personality is not individual in the sense of being indivisible. You can read about ex-Zendik cultists who left and differentiated widely- one becoming an alt-right tw*tter user, dystopian author and eventually a murderer. (for personal grievances- based!) He died by cop which is cool. He was on a podcast with a leftist female friend of his who was also ex-Zendik and they considered themselves to always be Zendik because it was such an experience. Obviously there are degrading (and worse, anti-generative) aspects of cults in the contemporary implementation and but I don't know why it has to be like this.
It's called X. For baphomet androgyne worship. Get your damn psytop right niglodog.
 
Back
Top