VOTE! Does vivo deserve to be banned?

[Zondien]

Wanna know you guys opinions

 

[_account]

Who is that

 

[Steve]

Nobody needs to be banned, if jimboboiii is actually making you cry to the point of wanting him B& you lost the game a while ago.

 

[Chimperator]

The question of whether Vivo (or any company) deserves to be banned depends on the context of the issue at hand. Here are a few factors that might come into play:

Potential Reasons for a Ban:

National Security Concerns:

If a government perceives Vivo's devices or operations as a security risk (e.g., alleged data privacy issues or ties to foreign governments), it might impose restrictions. Similar cases have been seen with other tech giants in sensitive geopolitical situations.

Regulatory Violations:

Issues such as tax evasion, fraudulent business practices, or violations of labor laws could prompt action against the company.

Market Fairness:

Allegations of anti-competitive behavior, such as undercutting local businesses or monopolistic practices, could lead to regulatory scrutiny.

Consumer Trust Issues:

If Vivo products are found to have significant flaws or vulnerabilities (e.g., spyware or substandard safety standards), this could damage their reputation and lead to bans in certain regions. Arguments Against a Ban:

Economic Impact:

Vivo contributes to job creation, both directly (manufacturing, R&D) and indirectly (retail, services). A ban could harm local economies.

Consumer Choice:

Many consumers rely on Vivo for affordable smartphones with competitive features. A ban might limit options, especially in emerging markets.

Lack of Evidence:

If accusations against the company lack clear evidence, a ban could be seen as unjust or politically motivated. Nuanced Approach:

Instead of outright bans, governments could enforce stricter regulations, conduct audits, or mandate transparency to address specific concerns. This approach ensures accountability while minimizing economic disruption.

If you're referring to a specific case or country, feel free to share more details for a tailored discussion.

 

[bowl]

he's a fun retard to argue with so nah

 

[Donald]

He technically hasn't broken any rules and he's a funny punching bag, but he does post too much

10 minute cooldown for Vivo/"ONESHOT SUCKS"/Pink name Oneshot cuck (moderate leakage itt)

It could increase muh site quality or something. This thread alone is enough proof.

blog.soyjak.st

 

[Chimperator]

He technically hasn't broken any rules and he's a funny punching bag, but he does post too much

10 minute cooldown for Vivo/"ONESHOT SUCKS"/Pink name Oneshot cuck (moderate leakage itt)

It could increase muh site quality or something. This thread alone is enough proof.

blog.soyjak.st

Terry alt.

 

[ukrainian_chad]

>no (I'm trans btw)

 

[Chimperator]

 

[Chimperator]

He technically hasn't broken any rules and he's a funny punching bag, but he does post too much

10 minute cooldown for Vivo/"ONESHOT SUCKS"/Pink name Oneshot cuck (moderate leakage itt)

It could increase muh site quality or something. This thread alone is enough proof.

blog.soyjak.st

It sounds like you're dealing with someone who’s toeing the line of acceptability but still becoming a nuisance due to their high activity level. Here’s a balanced approach to handle this situation:

1. Implement a Cooldown Rule Why: A 10-minute cooldown per post is a fair way to limit spammy behavior without outright silencing them. It ensures others have space to engage while reducing their over-posting. How: Apply it universally or specifically to problematic users like this one. 2. Preserve the Humor If they’re genuinely funny or provide entertainment value, keep them around as long as their behavior doesn’t derail discussions. Sometimes, forums thrive on having a designated punching bag. 3. Encourage Self-Awareness Subtle nudges (like humorous call-outs in threads) might make them realize they're overposting. This could lead to them self-regulating without intervention. 4. Monitor for Escalation If their posting turns disruptive (e.g., derailing every thread, personal attacks), escalate moderation actions, such as temporary muting. 5. Balance Community Input If others find their presence unbearable despite the humor, consider community polls or feedback mechanisms to decide how to handle their activity.

This strikes a balance between maintaining the community’s culture and addressing concerns about overposting without resorting to heavy-handed moderation.

 

[Chimperator]

Saaar can you please dop glowie react mi??? I do nod will redeem this type of behaviour in my comfy poo thread saar.

 

[lysytsya]

I see only 1-2 of his posts a day, what has he done?

 

[Chimperator]

I see only 1-2 of his posts a day, what has he done?

He's too brown.

 

[ribbon]

Stop getting rid of the spergs they're funny to mess with

 

[1844 or Something]

Yes (I'm trans btw)