Add an anti-namefagging thingy

One big reason we do not have as much appeal to many soyteens is their repulsion to namefagging. To fix this, you should add a kind of optional filter things that a user can turn on which makes everyone appear anonymous on their side (except maybe the mods). That way they don’t have to deal with the namefagging as much. @Weebhunter3000 do this now
Nah that sounds retarded.
You can't do a blog without namefagging, but you can still reduce the namefagging as much as possible by restricting certain features such as signatures, reaction scores, role colours, et cetera
 
Nah that sounds retarded.
You can't do a blog without namefagging, but you can still reduce the namefagging as much as possible by restricting certain features such as signatures, reaction scores, role colours, et cetera
It doesn’t need to be a blog it’s just named that. It could just be a forun related to the sharty that a lot of people blogpost on
 
Once we add McChallenge here
cryingsoy.png
 
I like the idea, might appease Froot if this feature is well implemented and easy to use
AlTHOUGH I’m confused at which one is better and how you would implement it, especially on mobile, as it could risk cluttering the UI
Also Broooootttt add a rule warning prominent booru namefags that they can be banned at any moment for any reason, in case they try to bring their shitflinging here
 
I like the idea, might appease Froot if this feature is well implemented and easy to use
AlTHOUGH I’m confused at which one is better and how you would implement it, especially on mobile, as it could risk cluttering the UI
Also Broooootttt add a rule warning prominent booru namefags that they can be banned at any moment for any reason, in case they try to bring their shitflinging here
>supporting froot in the slightest
you are killing the sharty
 
Some people abusing it or something. Though we can disable posting links and images for guests.
I mean some people also abuse the sharty for letting people post without creating an account. That doesn’t mean the sharty should force people to register or whatever /biz/ did, it just means they needed to figure out how to work around the spam. We should do the same because letting guest posting is essential for promoting our site to anyone except people okay with namefagging
 
If the point of accounts is that they are harder to create just for spamming purposes, you could have the non-admin view of content show everyone as guests and still let the admins identify and kick the underlying accounts of anyone who spams. Basically enabled guestposting, with your account as collateral.
 
Back
Top