We should just cane people for posting 'lita like the Singaporeans and leave it at that.I think he just posted it as a joke but I don't think a Perma is warranted, Maybe a 14 day or a month at best.
Then we would have to find where "bnwoclitty" lives.We should just cane people for posting 'lita like the Singaporeans and leave it at that.
Was it?Even doe it was 2 times in the same thread
How the fuck am I supposed feel bad for someone named "bnwoclitty" getting banned.Then we would have to find where "bnwoclitty" lives.
One regular 'lita, and another one with a 'jak hanging in the background. I wish I had a screenshot but it doesn't matter anywayWas it?
Thats a different situation, I thought it was like the base one on the wiki with some joking text, If thats true then the Perma is a lot more reasonable.One regular 'lita, and another one with a 'jak hanging in the background. I wish I had a screenshot but it doesn't matter anyway
Maybe but I still don’t like the idea of banning people for offenses that aren’t listed as bannable. It sets a bad precedenceThats a different situation, I thought it was like the base one on the wiki with some joking text, If thats true then the Perma is a lot more reasonable.
This, @Broot make a rule saying that soylita is banned.Maybe but I still don’t like the idea of banning people for offenses that aren’t listed as bannable. It sets a bad precedence
Red here AMAOn the topic of Pedos, Whatever happened to Red?
Why are you such a massive faggot?.Red here AMA
rule 2aThis, @Broot make a rule saying that soylita is banned.