Search results

They're the same in one aspect, both need violence. But one is necessary and the other is not (although it can be necessary too)

It's the same though. You need violent impulses to survive, in that case, violence is indeed the solution, to stomp and shake the ants off

Kids will get eaten by ants, just because they CAN'T violently respond to ants harming them

I predicted some of the new reactions amirite

I know that's why I'm asking to bring it back

Become Terryjak

do this^ I'm tired of niggazogannefrankillion reactions, I think I'm speaking for everyone when I say it's too much and we only need two reactions: Glowie and Like. Glowiereact if you disagree, Likereact if you agree. React anything else if you're a pedophile

McChallenge

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDS

I one day saw you in twitter saying you got your ass destroyed by a gay man

To get bugs out of your body you need VIOLENCE. OP needs to drink mercury

SISA

Second Terrychat ITT

Violence is necessary for our survival. The mere act to correct someone is violence, you need violence in order to progress and actually survive as a species. No way you want to breed out something so inherent to us, it will get us killed by the end of the year.

I'm being nice by calling him "just a piece of shit", he deserves more

OMGSISA

I mean, Jimbo is the universal scapegoat. Who wouldn't hate that piece of shit?

Terry is love, Terry is life.

We should make threads about the benefits of terrifying and terryposting