Search results

Idk but that was pretty bad. I just wrote nananananaaa brapbrapbrap as filler. The new Liker song probably has the best lyrics and Steve said "holy gem" in response to listening to the chorus

That was me

Racist nigger

When does she die so I can mark it on my calendar

Who?

As much as I hate furfags, their entire identity isn't based on wishing they could abuse little kids even though a huge portion of them are pedos. The same can't be said for lolicon gooners however

Listening to Soygoy's vocaroo and... g00ning

You're gross. You're disgusting. You're repulsive. You're revolting. You're foul. You're nasty. You're vile. You're nauseating. You're detestable. You're repugnant. You're odious. You're sickening. You're unpleasant. You're ingratiating. You're unbearable. You're unwholesome. You're offputting...

Nobody would be okay with a vague law that can ban anything but most people don't object to banning lolicon specifically

The Patriot Act targeted literally anyone who fit the criteria while banning lolicon just like how banned Ulysses is one thing. There's also the fact terrorism is political. The US government can accuse anyone it doesn't like of terrorism. Banning lolicon would shut down the lolicon boorus...

The government is corrupt lole. Didn't it say pornography is artistic and education, thus excempt from obscenity laws? It just protects people with money >its potential for abuse is unlimited It isn't. Another slippery slope fallacy. It only gets worse if the government tried to add more laws to...

The world is shit because our methods are shit. I'm not advocating for totalitarian government. I want people to see the causes, not just the effects. We never progress because we just play whack-a-mole endlessly instead of dropping a bunker buster on the ground and getting rid of the problem...

So many people are encouraged by their pedo peers to molest their own siblings. Nothing can be done until after the fact when the damage has already been done. I've seen so many cases and realized it could've been stopped at the beginning but it doesn't

All of this shit only protects pedophiles. You can't stop child abuses if you continue sitting on the fence allowing pedophiles to multiply and scheme in private chats. With the internet, pedophilia has become endemic.

>Also, obscenity laws were pretty much exclusively used to criminalize books like Lady Chatterley's Lover and Ulysses. There really has never been a single obscenity case that wasn't a grotesque miscarriage of justice. Yet people said the Texas bill is like that when I read it and checked it...

Also the whole thing of "BANNING LOLICON IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE" is literally a slippery slope fallacy

>I don't think that neo-Nazi speech should be illegal either. Neo-nazis speeches are not protected under the first amendment if they incite violence or intentionally try to disrupt the peace. The first amendment is not designed to allow everything. It's meant to restrict the government from...

>All crimes should have a victim. Cartoons - no matter how disgusting they may be - do not have a victim. As such, criminalizing them is a form of thought crime, and we don't prosecute thought crimes in the US. Let's just ignore the fact that child abuses are done by pedophiles. Also obscenity...

This is what I have to deal with when I argue with retards like him or MoonMetropolis