no proof doe. u claim muh babee jaks have 'p in them because all have in them. How? Just because you are too brown to understand the composition fallacy doesn't make what you say true
It's due to the fallacious assumption that not explicitly stating that ur anti-pedo means you are a pedo. This isn't true because it shifts the burden of proof to the accused pedo instead of prooving you are one. Then again you are probably familiar with fascism and its tenants so i didn't expect much.