I think lolicon should be legal but not for the reasons listed here and not for any RULE 2 breaking reasons.
soyjak.blog
Username:Required
SoySpotter
So if not for pedophilic reasons, why?
Chesnaught
Lolicon should be illegal for the same reason furry porn should be illegal. It's basically just a gateway to real shit.
It's never truly "victimless", as trooniggerpedos will attempt to claim. When it's no longer conditioning someone into becoming your average coomer, it's pushing them towards the point of no return.
It's never truly "victimless", as trooniggerpedos will attempt to claim. When it's no longer conditioning someone into becoming your average coomer, it's pushing them towards the point of no return.
Username:Required
Very hard to define under law and will likely be messed up
Very slippery slope.
Victimless unlike cp which requires a child to be abused
Often keeps pedophiles away from real children
And muh freeze peach.
Very slippery slope.
Victimless unlike cp which requires a child to be abused
Often keeps pedophiles away from real children
And muh freeze peach.
Chesnaught
^ Muh massive cope or whatever. I don't think anyone should be jerking off to children. The cure is therapy or death, not more 'P.
It's like a cancer, you don't just let a tumor sit there, even if it could be benign. If it can be treated, you treat it. If it can't, well you cut it out, so that it can't spread. And if it still does, well, you'd best hope you die from something else before the cancer kills you.
It's like a cancer, you don't just let a tumor sit there, even if it could be benign. If it can be treated, you treat it. If it can't, well you cut it out, so that it can't spread. And if it still does, well, you'd best hope you die from something else before the cancer kills you.
SmallAnus
>Often keeps pedophiles away from real children
This is proven false time and time again. Why do you think pedophiles care about 'P being bad? They have no moral compass and if they had one they wouldn't be pedophiles. I have seen zero proof of this being the case and lolicon always eases pedophiles into the actual thing as evidenced by some lolicon group leak shown by a Youtuber
This is proven false time and time again. Why do you think pedophiles care about 'P being bad? They have no moral compass and if they had one they wouldn't be pedophiles. I have seen zero proof of this being the case and lolicon always eases pedophiles into the actual thing as evidenced by some lolicon group leak shown by a Youtuber
Catter
@Username:Required there are far better hills to die on than this one
SmallAnus
Lolicon fags don't care about muh freeze peach either because they took the guy's video down for exposing the truth. They only use it as a convenient excuse to continue gooning to anime little kids in public websites
SmallAnus
This is the video I'm referring to that was upload on Kiwifarms several weeks ago
SoySpotter
why are we letting a lolicon defender on the site bro
SmallAnus
This is what I have to deal with when I argue with retards like him or MoonMetropolis
Username:Required
@SoySpotter I'm not a lolicon defender I think those faggots are all pedos, however I don't think that lolicon should be a crime.
Trying to ban animated depictions of something is an extremely slippery slope especially over lolicon which is hard to legally define.
Trying to ban animated depictions of something is an extremely slippery slope especially over lolicon which is hard to legally define.
Chesnaught
Pedo, zoo, or both? Call it now.
Pedo, zoo, or both? Call it now.
MoonMetropolis
@Username:Required is right, for all of the reasons I already stated in this thread: https://blog.soyjak.st/threads/texas-made-lolicon-a-felony.19002/
All crimes should have a victim. Cartoons - no matter how disgusting they may be - do not have a victim. As such, criminalizing them is a form of thought crime, and we don't prosecute thought crimes in the US.
All crimes should have a victim. Cartoons - no matter how disgusting they may be - do not have a victim. As such, criminalizing them is a form of thought crime, and we don't prosecute thought crimes in the US.
MoonMetropolis
>Pedo, zoo, or both? Call it now.
I don't think that neo-Nazi speech should be illegal either. That doesn't mean that I'm a neo-Nazi, retard. Defending freedom of speech means defending the most vile, despicable, and unpopular forms of speech. It means defending the speech that you hate the most.
I don't think that neo-Nazi speech should be illegal either. That doesn't mean that I'm a neo-Nazi, retard. Defending freedom of speech means defending the most vile, despicable, and unpopular forms of speech. It means defending the speech that you hate the most.
SmallAnus
>All crimes should have a victim. Cartoons - no matter how disgusting they may be - do not have a victim. As such, criminalizing them is a form of thought crime, and we don't prosecute thought crimes in the US.
Let's just ignore the fact that child abuses are done by pedophiles. Also obscenity is not protected under free speech and is one of the things except from the first amendment
Let's just ignore the fact that child abuses are done by pedophiles. Also obscenity is not protected under free speech and is one of the things except from the first amendment
SmallAnus
>I don't think that neo-Nazi speech should be illegal either.
Neo-nazis speeches are not protected under the first amendment if they incite violence or intentionally try to disrupt the peace. The first amendment is not designed to allow everything. It's meant to restrict the government from persecuting people from expressing their opinions or following their own religion
Neo-nazis speeches are not protected under the first amendment if they incite violence or intentionally try to disrupt the peace. The first amendment is not designed to allow everything. It's meant to restrict the government from persecuting people from expressing their opinions or following their own religion
Chesnaught
>"thought" crimes are when you are producing and consuming explicit material involving children and animals
Are you that dense? That's not a "thought crime", that's just a crime. There's no "victim" when someone is doing heroin, but I'd like to see you go do that in front of a cop.
Are you that dense? That's not a "thought crime", that's just a crime. There's no "victim" when someone is doing heroin, but I'd like to see you go do that in front of a cop.
SmallAnus
Also the whole thing of "BANNING LOLICON IS A SLIPPERY SLOPE" is literally a slippery slope fallacy
sodack
Let’s kill pedoniggers