soyjak.blog

A week

>Thems the law sis, ain't nothing I can do.
For someone who hates rulecucking, you sure like bowing down to some arbitrary piece of law deciding a sexualized image of a 10 year old is le okay. Would you be okay with it being legal for trannies to show their prolapsed anus to little girls for "educational purpose"?

It's 'P

is ytsuken perma'd?

I don't know why you're defending this shit @Username:Required. It's clearly pornographic image of a little girl, regardless of what faggot German government thinks. Germans are pedophiles and in civilized nations it's CP. Also rule 2 isn't limited to what the courts deem illegal

I think you've hit a new low

Why did he post that anyway? Like what was the context?

>tfw everything you said got misconstrued while you couldn't even defend yourself.
I wasn't defending the image I was defending ytsuken from allegations that he committed a crime

Did he or did he not post a picture of a naked little girl doing a sexual pose?

Is the image ytsuken posted classified under the law as cp? No, ytsuken did not post cp.
We're arguing two different things. I'm completely fine with banning users who post that or link that shit as it's disgusting (although ytsuken is a special case given the context that could be debated if this ban is deserved but that's not the argument).

Is lolicon classified under the law as cp? No. Is it still porn of literal children?

ytsuken claimed him posting cp was smart btw

Lolicon is not cp, the people who jerk off to it are pedophiles but I wouldn't call it child porn.

Define children and pornography and explain why you can't put the two together because some institution said you can't?

In the same way you cant call video game and animated violence real gore.

It's still gore even if it's from a game or animation. You cannot alter reality and change definitions of some things because it is fictional or not. Logic doesn't work that way. Logic is independent of fiction because if it wasn't, a lot of abstract concepts wouldn't exist

Please look at some aliens being killed in halo or demons being killed in doom and compare that to gore videos of heads being blown off and people getting bits chopped off and tell me it's anywhere close being the same.
I agree with you on lolicon being pedophilic but calling it cp on the same level as those disgusting rape videos is retarded.

It is porn. Porn of children. So while it isn't CSAM technically, it's child porn.

Whether or not gore is realistic or even comparable to real life is subjective. Nobody is saying video game gore is as real as real gore, but logically it's still an alien getting his head blown off and bleeding blue blood everywhere. This applies to lolicon or even "artistic" images that the government deemed is not a pornographic image of a kid

Nobody is saying it's as bad as literal DD but they're in essence, porn of kids. If you take away fiction or the severity elements, it's still porn of kids. We still permaban users for posting lolicon despite it being a fictional little girl and still not illegal in the US. At the end of the day they are the same, identity wise, and debating over semantics or whatever is cringe and intentionally being fallacious

>It is porn. Porn of children. So while it isn't CSAM technically, it's child porn.
Exactly. That's why they call actual 'P CSAM to differentiate between the two

is u:r's argument that cartoon gore is legal, so cartoon child porn should also be legal.