soyjak.blog

General Niggnin
General Niggnin
because capital and the state enslave everyone in society using debt and psyops. Since the Roman Empire domination of others has been how society has functioned and I think that’s wrong and evil
Catter
Catter
So you're ancom? How do you think things should be ran and how would you make sure no one would rise to power randomly and shits it up?
General Niggnin
General Niggnin
There would be no hierarchy or capital, it wouldn’t be possible to gain more then one needs since there would be no ownership of industries only shared industries of people working in them. Everyone would also be armed so if foreign invaders or reactionaries try to establish a dictatorship there would be very large pushback
Catter
Catter
I see, wouldn't you realistically need a "state" or a government to handle redistributing stuff or something? And how would you deal with people who can work but refuse to? [1]
Catter
Catter
And wouldn't this make it hard for the people to know what people want because of the lack of supply and demand? also because of the lack of supply and demand wouldn't the quality of everything be very bad due to the lack of need for innovation? And how exactly would the law be handled?
General Niggnin
General Niggnin
The state is a machine enslaving people. It is a social construct and social constructs aren’t really real so you can edit them in almost any way so it’s 100% possible for people to just redistribute this already happens on many communes. Independent communes would just trade resources with each other it’s pretty simple. [1]
General Niggnin
General Niggnin
One person would be a doctor and would heal injured people then another would be a fisherman and they would trade using both of their skills. And for larger productions they would work altogether in a industry. There would still be innovation and people would still improve on themselves but it would just be individuals and communes doing it instead of corporations. [2]
Back
Top