soyjak.blog

Shut up nigger, I'm looking for a reaction image

No, you’re losing the debate, bitch.

Okay, you're telling me mohammed flew a magic horse to Jerusalem?

Notice how he did a red herring fallacy? So you dropped the point and admitted that God exists? Okay so I debunked your whole outlook on life go think twice bitch.

Ngl islam sounds like it ripped off a bunch of things from paganism

When did I admit god exists?
When did I do a red herring fallacy?
It sounds like you're just throwing out random claims that sound smart in hopes that you'll sound like you're winning

You did that via switching away from the point we were talking about and that’s the contradiction of Agnosticism
Also no? You’re too retarded to understand what these are used for and why I’m saying them.
Oh and you did that if you switch away from a point which is dropping it meaning you conceded to the argument.

Also I don’t care about your zoomer ngl sentence because it holds no value to what I just said, we can run that after I absolutely destroy you on this topic like how a homeless man destroyed your fat moms pussy.

I never conceded to the argument
In fact you just made me more convinced that there is no god

Also, notice how the kebab resorts to ad hominems when he's losing

Also no that’s not an as hominem, lols like you don’t even understand THAT. It happens when you DO NOT make an argument, but I did. Also Look how the little raisinskin runs away and doesn’t refute my argument and is making points not related to anything I said. Wow you must really suck. I’ll ask Goldy, another agnostic to judge this debate.

Also yes you did concede via not refuting it LMAO.

Conceding means I accept the argument and believe it as true now, which I don't, it had the opposite effect

Also, by the same logic you conceded to mohammed's flying magical horse not actually being real

It doesn’t matter, concessions come in a multitude of ways, especially in a debate. If you don’t refute it, you lose the point, simple, also prove it has an effect with empirical evidence and prove that debates hinge off of YOUR belief, I don’t care about if you’re convinced or not, I just care about winning this debate because you’re not here for. A good faith conversation.

No, because I addressed your claim when you said that as a red herring because it DID in fact have nothing to do with what I said.

Of course you're here to have a good faith conversation by jartycuck reacting my posts, deleting my posts and making cheap disgusting sexual claims about my mother

Obviously I’m gonna be bad faith, look at your main message and the images you’re sending lmao, along with praising a mass shooter who killed kids. (Which is against the rules btw so good luck getting banned for that LMAO), deleting posts that are outside of the thread is good enough because it keeps you on track. I’m not gonna give you more rhetorical power.

Anyways are you gonna address the flying horse or not?

Also nice not refuting anything I said, LMAOOOO THIS CUCK LOST THE DEBATE LOOOL