What text fail are you referring to? Everything within that message is grammatically correct.
soyjak.blog
Warrior-Z
Sneedson
Muzziesfags have never heard of ‘remove formatting’, how do u keep losing?
Warrior-Z
Red herring fallacy, you genuinely are more pathetic than I thought you'd be.
Sneedson
>nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God.
Warrior-Z
HE STOPPED TALKING, HE GOT STUNLOCKED 
THEN HE PROCEEDS TO SAY THE SAME POSITION THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DEBUNKED
THEN HE PROCEEDS TO SAY THE SAME POSITION THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DEBUNKED
Warrior-Z
Omg Foldy how are you this ass at debating?
Sneedson
>any ultimate reality (such as God) is unknown and probably unknowable
Warrior-Z
Ignorance is bliss... watch him keep repeating the claim like a rouge monkey because he's been stunlocked within THIS CONVERSATION
Warrior-Z
And btw I've screenshotted everything here so you dont pussy out and delete your comments.
Sneedson
>someone who does not know, or believes that it is impossible to know, if a god exists
Warrior-Z
Keep repeating your claims, it only shows your incompetence and your lack of ability to argue.
Sneedson
>person who holds that the answers to the basic questions of existence, such as the nature of the ultimate cause and whether or not there is a supreme being, are unknown or unknowable
Warrior-Z
Yeah, good bitch. Keep doing as I say, this is making you look pathetic asf.
Sneedson
>someone who does not know, or believes that it is impossible to know, if a god exists
Warrior-Z
Do you love to get humiliated?
Sneedson
>agnosticism
Warrior-Z
HE RAN OUT OF DEFINITIONS
Sneedson
>it is not possible to know whether God exists or not
Warrior-Z
I don't think Goldy is EVER going to reply to the syllogism I sent debunking agnosticism.
Sneedson
>a person who claims that they cannot have true knowledge about the existence of God (but does not deny that God might exist)
