Sharty I don't like it here, but it's the most convinient way to connect with the soysphere atm

Nihilma might have the screenshot of that post of his in particular since I don't. But from the other posts he made he was doomed to get banned anyway.
1710575098934.png
1710575231903.png
1710575098934.png
 
yes this place is namefag cord niggerhell
I just don't really change how i talk to people and it's fine. If i have a positive interaction with someone, I'm not going to refrain from calling them a faggot if i think they're being a faggot.
It's not really a 'cord circlejerk to me, but I've never used cord anyway so maybe i can't talk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
he didn't make the post in the first pic doe idk what you're trying to prove with that one
1721691551666.png

 
he didn't make the post in the first pic doe idk what you're trying to prove with that one
Those were the pictures posted by one of the jannies at the time so I just posted them here (still at work so no time to curate screenshots).
 
Also she got banned for making alts to boost his Reddit karma doe
 
The evidence here was that xhe liked a post you made. I wonder what that post was.
It's this post right here, a pretty early post of mine. I'm not sure what brought me to defend Konata, knowing in the back of my head he was an iffy character (wasn't aware he was a full-on pedophile as displayed by that other post defending child pornography, but I knew anime people do stray into this kind-of "weird" territory when speaking of their cartoons, just from how they can sometimes act). I think I wrote it late in the night, just before bed (as displayed by a few typos and a partial lack of my usual writing style), so it's most likely I wasn't thinking about why this Konata guy was acting the way he was, I was just focused on the words-words-words derailment dilemma of "erm... well, I'd say some seventeen-year-olds have the mental acuity of an eighteen-year-old" without then realizing we're talking about Konata's cartoon child crush, here.
 
>Eh, It's legal in my state. and I don't see what's wrong with JUST one year less, and that's it. Thinking about things logically and thinking of WHY we have A.o.C laws (preventing the youth from being exploited), them knowing what's right and wrong for their sexual activity is something that develops throughout much of their developmental years that have often reached their end by an age like someone who is at least a few months into being a seventeen-year-old, and when we're talking about what could come about from making things one year less from the usual, magical number of eighteen, we're talking about a miniscule, minority of relationships between people throughout all of society when it comes to people being in relationships with one another, since most people will still be going for people around their age, and the vast majority of people who are going to be dating someone at the youngest acceptable age are people who are also nearby that age. By seventeen, I'm pretty sure a person knows much more than something that is actually an unacceptable age, like fifteen or sixteen, obviously. I myself am still in my teens, so I'm not a legal adult when saying this, yet it's even an understandable concept to myself. Now, thing below seventeen are where I will start to disagree, but seventeen itself seems completely normal and fine, and I don't know why you're freaking out.

1695656444682-1.gif


<ERM. POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE, MUCH?

1701039706787.png
 
>Eh, It's legal in my state. and I don't see what's wrong with JUST one year less, and that's it. Thinking about things logically and thinking of WHY we have A.o.C laws (preventing the youth from being exploited), them knowing what's right and wrong for their sexual activity is something that develops throughout much of their developmental years that have often reached their end by an age like someone who is at least a few months into being a seventeen-year-old, and when we're talking about what could come about from making things one year less from the usual, magical number of eighteen, we're talking about a miniscule, minority of relationships between people throughout all of society when it comes to people being in relationships with one another, since most people will still be going for people around their age, and the vast majority of people who are going to be dating someone at the youngest acceptable age are people who are also nearby that age. By seventeen, I'm pretty sure a person knows much more than something that is actually an unacceptable age, like fifteen or sixteen, obviously. I myself am still in my teens, so I'm not a legal adult when saying this, yet it's even an understandable concept to myself. Now, thing below seventeen are where I will start to disagree, but seventeen itself seems completely normal and fine, and I don't know why you're freaking out.

View attachment 19808


<ERM. POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE, MUCH?

View attachment 19807
Are you defending him??
 
It's this post right here, a pretty early post of mine. I'm not sure what brought me to defend Konata, knowing in the back of my head he was an iffy character (wasn't aware he was a full-on pedophile as displayed by that other post defending child pornography, but I knew anime people do stray into this kind-of "weird" territory when speaking of their cartoons, just from how they can sometimes act). I think I wrote it late in the night, just before bed (as displayed by a few typos and a partial lack of my usual writing style), so it's most likely I wasn't thinking about why this Konata guy was acting the way he was, I was just focused on the words-words-words derailment dilemma of "erm... well, I'd say some seventeen-year-olds have the mental acuity of an eighteen-year-old" without then realizing we're talking about Konata's cartoon child crush, here.
I saw that post after I made my own and I thought it wasn't too outlandish of one to make. I thought it was weird that the janny screenshotted him liking your post in particular instead of them screenshotting the post that Konata made that got you to defend him.
 
I really dislike your tone, I'm obviously poking fun at the fact that @baqqrih is being dragged out here because some guy liked some not even incriminating statement he made
Maybe he just mistakenly thought you were quoting (and therefore defending) Konata.
 
Maybe he just mistakenly thought you were quoting (and therefore defending) Konata.
>even doe I quoted your message which you can see in the screenshot
In reality they're vultures, just waiting to jump on the opportunity, to jump on a remark ever so slightly out there. Which I can't really complain about; I like dancing on the razors edge, I know which remarks will get me in hot waters. It's a bit of a pull and push game
 
It's this post right here, a pretty early post of mine. I'm not sure what brought me to defend Konata, knowing in the back of my head he was an iffy character
The best thing to do is not defend anybody in the community unless you are 110% sure they are worth defending. Kernung and the trend of admin worshipping are good examples of why people shouldn't defend people they don't know online as it always turns to coal and degrades the community into middleschool cliques sniping at each other.
 
Back
Top