VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

[Warrior-Z]

Nothing says something "shouldn't be done" like having the unrivaled model of virtue in character, worship, and obedience to divine guidance participate in one.

Like I’ve said, it doesn’t logically follow with with the entity (PBUH) we speak of doing something that is not recommended for others to do. I’ve already gave you multiple analogies in which refuse that we can go over them again. As a matter of fact, I’ll just put on paragraphs upon paragraphs to refute your claims.

 

[Watt]

 

[Warrior-Z]

Couldn't find anything that says it's makruh except on Reddit btw

I mean, I could bring up an entire book if you want since it’s literally contained in there and I’ve posted that source in the SoyBooru thread. Do you want to debate the topic?

 

[Gigafly]

First of all, nice strawman fallacy go ahead and justify how that would refute my whole argument.

That isn't a strawman fallacy at all, I'm showing a hadith (which is in the Sahih Muslim) that directly says that images of living beings is haram, which has more weight than a scholarly opinion

 

[Gemerald]

Couldn't find anything that says it's makruh except on Reddit btw

Because Z spends literal hours digging for obscure rules followed by a minority of muslims to "win" moralistic debates on islam

 

[ThremboSchlog]

>Another Jartycuck react
@Gemerald
In debates and arguments, the burden of proof lies with the individual making a positive assertion - claiming something exists or is true. This person must provide evidence or logical reasoning to support their claim. Conversely, the person denying or questioning the assertion doesn't bear the responsibility of proving the negation. Instead, they simply challenge the positive claimant to substantiate their assertion.
Shifting this burden to the negative side is a fallacy known as "proving the negative." This occurs when someone demands proof from the person denying an assertion, unfairly reversing the responsibility. The burden of proof principle ensures that claimants provide substantial evidence and protects against fallacious reasoning.

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

la pasión​

 

[Warrior-Z]

That isn't a strawman fallacy at all,

Yes, you did since you completely ignored my arguments and you just showed a source which by the way isnt more than the sources that I provided.

I'm showing a hadith (which is in the Sahih Muslim) that directly says that images of living beings is haram, which has more weight than a scholarly opinion

Actually scholarly opinion would come from both holy books and such sources in question the thing is that it is a consensus that it is indeed allowed which does not hold more weight and we can debate if it does have more weight and you’re gonna get absolutely slammed.

 

[Gigafly]

What a fucking miserable religion. People give up their passions to follow the word of a barbarian pedophile who died 1500 years ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/islam/comments/xz37eg

 

[ThremboSchlog]

la pasión​

View attachment 172733

 

[Warrior-Z]

Because Z spends literal hours digging for obscure rules followed by a minority of muslims to "win" moralistic debates on islam

I mean, you can go ahead and prove that they’re obscure and only a minority follows them.

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

 

[Warrior-Z]

Debate it where? And what's your "book" and what's your claim based on?

Like I said, my claim is based on the book itself and the sayings of the caliph RA.
And we can debate it ITT or in VC.

 

[ThremboSchlog]

Marge

 

[meijak]

Haha! Nice attempt at trolling, only thing you own is maybe a dirty Kleenex you shot into after gooning your TBP to anime ‘p.

I'm not trolling, if you lived in your shitskin country I could buy you for cheap because you're a petulant nigger.

 

[Warrior-Z]

What a fucking miserable religion. People give up their passions to follow the word of a barbarian pedophile who died 1500 years ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/islam/comments/xz37eg

Yeah, some thread doesn’t really prove your claim whatsoever and we can debate upon if he (PBUH) was a pedo or not or a Barbarian.

 

[ThremboSchlog]

obsessed jartyfly jannies

 

[Gemerald]

I mean, you can go ahead and prove that they’re obscure and only a minority follows them.

Citing the previous discussion we had, you accepted that only two of the four sunni muslim schools teach that cousin marriage is makruh. Sunni muslims make up less than 100 percent of the muslim population, therefore it can be asserted that less than half of the muslim population follows the cousin marriage rule.

 

[Warrior-Z]

I'm not trolling,

Yes you are kek, and you’re piping tf up because there’s multiple people backing you up but you’re still pathetically losing as I’m the strongest ITT.

if you lived in your shitskin country I could buy you for cheap

ESL and slavery is illegal there so nope. Keep raging sissy.

 

[meijak]

Yes you are kek, and you’re piping tf up because there’s multiple people backing you up but you’re still pathetically losing as I’m the strongest ITT.

You're acting as if I've never shat on you or your faith before. One could say you're arguing in bad faith. Brap.