thread_prefix.19 General christian thread

Good thing pharisees aren't the apostles.

Good thing the Apostles recorded everything they were told to by God in scripture... and there is no need for any traditions of men. Anything else is literally man's word > God's.
 
You are not authority on history. It isn't because you make up something that suddenly it becomes reality.
Google is more accurate than you when it comes to history and scientific data, because it compiles and gives the modern consensus on purely empirical data.
Google sucks for theology, politics and philosophy. But not raw data and history.

You give random numbers without a single proof

Hahahaha okay normie.
2inyzded3nt01.jpg


Go grab another booster shot while you're at it.
1716497176201.jpeg
 
strawman.
Logical fallacy, no argument.

Btw you still haven't answered my original paragraph.

There was no scripture, nothing for me to answer. Just your false version of normie history that's provably false.
 
Good thing the Apostles recorded everything they were told to by God in scripture... and there is no need for any traditions of men. Anything else is literally man's word > God's.
We can't expect the Apostles to remember everything.
 
We can't expect the Apostles to remember everything.

Oh so if the apostles couldn't remember to write it down as it was happening, I'm sure you know what happened.. and your Orthodix priests know better too right? Traditions of men. Literally created out of thin air..... yikes this larp is cringe asf.
 
There was no scripture, nothing for me to answer. Just your false version of normie history that's provably false.
The original paragraph didn't include any history, just comparison of theological theory between muslims and christians, no matter where they come from.
The fact remains and you haven't answered them.
The bible is not a book, it's a compilation of book, and the old testament of protestants is the one that rabbinic jews came up with after the first centuries
 
The original paragraph didn't include any history, just comparison of theological theory between muslims and christians, no matter where they come from.
The fact remains and you haven't answered them.
The bible is not a book, it's a compilation of book, and the old testament of protestants is the one that rabbinic jews came up with after the first centuries

All religion is exactly the same. Which I've proven countless times. The Bible itself is the only book that teaches faith alone in Jesus Christ.
 
All religion is exactly the same. Which I've proven countless times. The Bible itself is the only book that teaches faith alone in Jesus Christ.
You still haven't answered to me.
The Bible isn't a book, it is a compilation of books from different authors from different times
 
Oh so if the apostles couldn't remember to write it down as it was happening, I'm sure you know what happened..
So when taking long times not having a chance to stop with Jesus, travelling to cities, for example, it was written in real time? Or how about when some apostles were part of those events? Was Peter writing down what was happening while he was cutting off the ear of the soldier or running away?

Even if we're to assume so, refer to Nihilma's post about it. Something wrong when compiling all these works, and translating them mind you, is bound to happen. It's been proven that some of the Bible, including the New Testament has been lost.
and your Orthodix priests know better too right?
The apostles know better, they passed the tradition down and said tradition is now referred to as Orthodoxy.
Traditions of men.
Nope.
Literally created out of thin air..... yikes this larp is cringe asf.
You sound like a faggot.
 
The original paragraph didn't include any history, just comparison of theological theory between muslims and christians, no matter where they come from.
The fact remains and you haven't answered them.
The bible is not a book, it's a compilation of book, and the old testament of protestants is the one that rabbinic jews came up with after the first centuries

Another "Christian" that doesn't believe the Bible is the word of God, ya'll fake asf. Luke warm asf.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. 2 Timothy 3:16
 
I don't understand how you think I'm misjudging the apostles, when the tradition not from the scripture was started from them. Like Lent, for example. If they promoted these traditions, and it isn't included in the Bible, what conclusion would you make from that?
 
So when taking long times not having a chance to stop with Jesus, travelling to cities, for example, it was written in real time? Or how about when some apostles were part of those events? Was Peter writing down what was happening while he was cutting off the ear of the soldier or running away?

Even if we're to assume so, refer to Nihilma's post about it. Something wrong when compiling all these works, and translating them mind you, is bound to happen. It's been proven that some of the Bible, including the New Testament has been lost.

The apostles know better, they passed the tradition down and said tradition is now referred to as Orthodoxy.

Nope.

You sound like a faggot.

I get it, you don't believe the Bible is the word of God. You trust man's word and man's traditions over the Bible. That is religion.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. 2 Timothy 3:16

I am a Bible Thumper Chud. I don't need some fag in a dress to tell me how to think or how to interpret the Bible. I have Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.
 
Another "Christian" that doesn't believe the Bible is the word of God, ya'll fake asf. Luke warm asf.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. 2 Timothy 3:16
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God"
You literally posted it yourself, you cannot read. Also I never said the Bible isn't the word of God, I said the Bible is the INSPIRED Word of God, meaning it is both divine and human. As I said in my original paragraph.
God inspired men to write, and men wrote with their humanity what God inspired them.
You strawmanned me again, bravo. I guess sometimes you cannot use anything else than logical fallascies to support your view
 
Back
Top