thread_prefix.26 The Landfill: Derailments Found Here!


This thread is getting really fat and gassy. I can smell it from all the way over here!
 
mischizo said:
porn
Click to expand...
holy kek I just noticed this
a whole 'nother level of being obsessed, get help
1727873100545.png
 
ISTANBUL said:
felt self conscious now that I noticed it?
Click to expand...
I literally removed it after making that post because I realized I grew tired of OWNING kiwithemecucks every time I post
but thanks to your retardation, my hate is now reinvigorated
 
mischizo said:
I literally removed it after making that post because I realized I grew tired of OWNING kiwithemecucks every time I post
but thanks to your retardation, my hate is now reinvigorated
Click to expand...
owning kiwicucks even doe it's addressed at me specifically kek
 
@Aedra Current "marriages" aren't traditional marriages in the terms effectively offered or accepted. If I marry someone in libtard world, it doesn't make sense to leak aeverywhere when the marriage is a libtard marriage with a "no sexytimes without DOUBLE consent" clause. If a female friend of yours was entering into a marriage contract with a man you would offer her much more cautious counsel if we were in a chuddy world where men can Patria potestas their wives and kids into random cornfield on a whim. It isn't right to adjust the meaning of contracts after the fact and pretend nothing changed.

(Of course the courts and the law periodically do just that, redefine what the culture should accept a marriage contract to mean. The takeaway is that the terms of these contracts depend on the whims of the legal system. If that doesn't sound like a union in the eyes of god, that's probably because it isn't. Don't engage in or hold respect for what the system calls marriage.)
 
divorce chancellor said:
@Aedra Current "marriages" aren't traditional marriages in the terms effectively offered or accepted. If I marry someone in libtard world, it doesn't make sense to leak aeverywhere when the marriage is a libtard marriage with a "no sexytimes without DOUBLE consent" clause. If a female friend of yours was entering into a marriage contract with a man you would offer her much more cautious counsel if we were in a chuddy world where men can Patria potestas their wives and kids into random cornfield on a whim. It isn't right to adjust the meaning of contracts after the fact and pretend nothing changed.

(Of course the courts and the law periodically do just that, redefine what the culture should accept a marriage contract to mean. The takeaway is that the terms of these contracts depend on the whims of the legal system. If that doesn't sound like a union in the eyes of god, that's probably because it isn't. Don't engage in or hold respect for what the system calls marriage.)
Click to expand...
Schizobabble that I understood none of
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

bowl
something quite interesting i found on nagolbud....
2
Replies
23
Views
257
UendeligKamp
UendeligKamp
Back
Top